Epigenetic prediction of complex traits and death
Daniel L. McCartneyiD, Robert Francis HillaryiD, Anna J. StevensoniD, Stuart James RitchieiD, Rosie May WalkeriD, Qian ZhangiD, Stewart W. Morris, Mairead L. BerminghamiD, Archie I CampbelliD, Alison D. MurrayiD, Heather Clare WhalleyiD, Catharine R. GaléiD, David John PorteousiD, Chris HaleyiD, Allan F. McRaeiD, Naomi R. WrayiD, Peter M. VisscheriD, Andrew Mark McIntoshiD, Kathryn Louise EvansiD, Ian J. DearyiD, Riccardo Emilio MarioniiD
Abstract
BackgroundGenome-wide DNA methylation (DNAm) profiling has allowed for the development of molecular predictors for a multitude of traits and diseases. Such predictors may be more accurate than the self-reported phenotypes, and could have clinical applications. Here, penalised regression models were used to develop DNAm predictors for body mass index (BMI), smoking status, alcohol consumption, and educational attainment in a cohort of 5,100 individuals. Using an independent test cohort comprising 906 individuals, the proportion of phenotypic variance explained in each trait was examined for DNAm-based and genetic predictors. Receiver operator characteristic curves were generated to investigate the predictive performance of DNAm-based predictors, using dichotomised phenotypes. The relationship between DNAm scores and all-cause mortality (n = 214 events) was assessed via Cox proportional-hazards models.\n\nResultsThe DNAm-based predictors explained different proportions of the phenotypic variance for BMI (12%), smoking (60%), alcohol consumption (12%) and education (3%). The combined genetic and DNAm predictors explained 20% of the variance in BMI, 61% in smoking, 13% in alcohol consumption, and 6% in education. DNAm predictors for smoking, alcohol, and education but not BMI predicted mortality in univariate models. The predictors showed moderate discrimination of obesity (AUC=0.67) and alcohol consumption (AUC=0.75), and excellent discrimination of current smoking status (AUC=0.98). There was poorer discrimination of college-educated individuals (AUC=0.59).\n\nConclusionsDNAm predictors correlate with lifestyle factors that are associated with health and mortality. They may supplement DNAm-based predictors of age to identify the lifestyle profiles of individuals and predict disease risk.\n\nList of abbreviations
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 256
- FWCI
- 7.73
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- An integrative analysis of clinical and epigenetic biomarkers of mortality
Tianxiao Huan, Steve Nguyen, … Daniel A Levy·Aging CellPeer-reviewed·May 12, 2022
- The association of DNA methylation with body mass index: distinguishing between predictors and biomarkers
Zoe E. Reed, Matthew J Suderman, … Gibran Hemani·Clinical EpigeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 30, 2020
- Epigenetic predictors of lifestyle traits applied to the blood and brain
Danni A. Gadd, Anna J. Stevenson, … Riccardo Emilio Marioni·Brain CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2021
- An epigenetic predictor of death captures multi-modal measures of brain health
Robert Francis Hillary, Anna J. Stevenson, … Riccardo Emilio Marioni·Molecular PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·Dec 3, 2019
- A systematic evaluation of 41 DNA methylation predictors across 101 data preprocessing and normalization strategies highlights considerable variation in algorithm performance
Anil P. S. Ori, Ake Tzu-Hui Lu, … Roel A. Ophoff·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 24, 2022
- Genome-wide association studies identify 137 loci for DNA methylation biomarkers of ageing
Daniel L. McCartney, Josine L. Min, … Jerome I. Rotter·bioRxiv·Jun 29, 2020