G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
Induction and inhibition of Drosophila X chromosome gene expression are both impeded by the dosage compensation complex
Richard P. MeiseliD, Danial AsgariiD, Florencia SchlampiD, Robert L. UncklessiD
Abstract
Sex chromosomes frequently differ from the autosomes in the frequencies of genes with sexually dimorphic or tissue-specific expression. Multiple hypotheses have been put forth to explain the unique gene content of the X chromosome, including selection against male-beneficial X-linked alleles, expression limits imposed by the haploid dosage of the X in males, and interference by the dosage compensation complex (DCC) on expression in males. Here, we investigate these hypotheses by examining differential gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster following several treatments that have widespread transcriptomic effects: bacterial infection, viral infection, and abiotic stress. We found that genes that are induced (up-regulated) by these biotic and abiotic treatments are frequently under-represented on the X chromosome, but so are those that are repressed (down-regulated) following treatment. We further show that whether a gene is bound by the DCC in males can largely explain the paucity of both up- and down-regulated genes on the X chromosome. Specifically, genes that are bound by the DCC, or close to a DCC high-affinity site, are unlikely to be up- or down-regulated after treatment. This relationship, however, could partially be explained by a correlation between differential expression and breadth of expression across tissues. Nonetheless, our results suggest that DCC binding, or the associated chromatin modifications, inhibit both up- and down-regulation of X chromosome gene expression within specific contexts. We propose multiple possible mechanisms of action for the effect, including a role of Males absent on the first (Mof), a component of the DCC, as a dampener of gene expression variance in both males and females. This effect could explain why the Drosophila X chromosome is depauperate in genes with tissue-specific or induced expression, while the mammalian X has an excess of genes with tissue-specific expression.
- organism: Drosophila
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: database / resource
- approach: statistical model
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Field percentile
- top 42%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Non-canonical Drosophila X chromosome dosage compensation and repressive topologically-associated domains
Hangnoh Lee, Brian Oliver·Epigenetics & ChromatinPeer-reviewed·Oct 24, 2018
- Developmental regulation of Drosophila dosage compensation in a 3D genome context
Lubna Younas, Mujahid Ali, … Qi Zhou·bioRxiv·Feb 28, 2025
- Dosage compensation defects due to roX RNA deletion are rescued by recalibration of X/autosome stoichiometry
Fotios Gkountromichos, George Yankson, … Peter B. Becker·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jun 16, 2026
- Single-cell RNA-sequencing reveals pre-meiotic X-chromosome dosage compensation in Drosophila testis
Evan Witt, Zhantao Shao, … Li Zhao·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 17, 2021
- Modulation of transcription burst amplitude underpins dosage compensation in the Drosophila embryo
Lauren Forbes Beadle, Hongpeng Zhou, … Hilary L. Ashe·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2023
- The Drosophila Dosage Compensation Complex activates target genes by chromosome looping within the active compartment
Tamás Schauer, Yad Ghavi-Helm, … Peter B. Becker·bioRxiv·Jan 19, 2017