bioRxivImmunologyPreprint
A humoral stress response protects Drosophila tissues from antimicrobial peptides
S. Rommelaere, A. Carboni, J. F. Bada Juarez, J.-P. Boquete, L. A. Abriata, F. Teixeira Pinto Meireles, V. Rukes, C. M. Vincent, S. Kondo, M. S. Dionne, M. Dal Peraro, C. Cao, B. Lemaitre
Abstract
The immune response against an invading pathogen is generally associated with collateral tissue damage caused by the immune system itself. Consequently, several resilience mechanisms have evolved to attenuate the negative impacts of immune effectors. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are small, cationic peptides that contribute to innate defenses by targeting negatively charged membranes of microbes1, 2. While being protective against pathogens, AMPs can be cytotoxic to host cells1, 3. Little is known of mechanisms that protect host tissues from AMP-induced immunopathology. Here, we reveal that a family of stress-induced proteins, the Turandots4, 5, protect Drosophila host tissues from AMPs, increasing resilience to stress. Deletion of several Turandot genes increases fly susceptibility to environmental stresses due to trachea apoptosis and poor oxygen supply. Tracheal cell membranes expose high levels of phosphatidylserine, a negatively charged phospholipid, sensitizing them to the action of AMPs. Turandots are secreted from the fat body upon stress and bind to tracheal cells to protect them against AMPs. In vitro, Turandot A binds to phosphatidylserine on membranes and inhibits the pore-forming activity of Drosophila and human AMPs on eukaryotic cells without affecting their microbicidal activity. Collectively, these data demonstrate that Turandot stress proteins mitigate AMP cytotoxicity to host tissues and therefore improve their efficacy. This provides a first example of a humoral mechanism used by animals limiting host-encoded AMP collateral damages.
- organism: Drosophila
- research focus: host-pathogen & immune response
- research focus: cell signaling & trafficking
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: cell-cell communication
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Membrane Tethering of Honeybee Antimicrobial Peptides in Drosophila Enhances Pathogen Defense at the Cost of Stress-Induced Host Vulnerability
Yanan Wei, Yanying Sun, … Woo Jae Kim·ChemBioChemPeer-reviewed·Oct 28, 2025
- The phosphatidylserine-binding proteins Turandots protect the peripheral nervous system from antimicrobial peptide toxicity
Samuel Rommelaere, Siqi Wang, … Bruno Lemaître·bioRxiv·May 4, 2026
- A Nonsecretory Antimicrobial Peptide Mediates Inflammatory Organ Damage in Drosophila Renal Tubules
Ayano Oi, Natsuki Shinoda, … Fumiaki Obata·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Dec 24, 2024
- Anti-tumor effects of antimicrobial peptides, targets of the innate immune system, against hematopoietic tumors in Drosophila mxc mutants
Mayo Araki, Massanori Kurihara, … Yoshihiro H. Inoue·Disease Models & MechanismsPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2019
- Synergy and remarkable specificity of antimicrobial peptides in vivo using a systematic knockout approach
M. A. Hanson, A. Dostalova, … B. Lemaitre·bioRxiv·Dec 13, 2018
- Ageing leads to nonspecific antimicrobial peptide responses in Drosophila melanogaster
B. Shit, A. Prakash, … I. Khan·bioRxiv·Jun 25, 2022