A systematic identification of resistance determinants to antisense antibiotics suggests adaptation strategies dependent on the delivery peptide
Adam J. MulkerniD, Thu-Hien Vu, Linda PopellaiD, Tobias KerrinnesiD, Svetlana Ðurica-MitićiD, Manuel HalteiD, Kylee Dresbach-Hill, Anne‐Catrin UhlemanniD, Stephan UphoffiD, Lars BarquistiD, Jörg VogeliD, Marco GalardiniiD
Abstract
The rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among human pathogenic microbes is a serious threat to global health, calling for the development of novel treatment strategies. Antibiotics based on programmable antisense oligomers (asobiotics) offer an attractive solution to the "arms-race", as their specificity can be quickly updated and tailored to target resistant bacteria. In order to understand the genetic architecture of resistance to asobiotics, we employed laboratory evolution assays to identify mutations that decrease susceptibility to antisense peptide nucleic acid (PNA) against four major gram-negative pathogens: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Salmonella enterica, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. We observed that the reduction in susceptibility upon asobiotics treatment was dependent on the specific cell penetrating peptide (CPP) being conjugated to the PNAs, suggesting that reduced uptake is a common adaptation strategy only against the (KFF)3-K CPP. We in fact observed that sbmA was frequently mutated in all tested species when treated with (KFF)3-K conjugated PNAs. We further identified mutations related to translation, peptide transport and cell envelope, which provide new hypotheses on cellular response to CPP-PNAs conjugates. Furthermore, for (RXR)4XB-acpP we observed a modest increase in resistance only when mutations in the PNA binding site were induced, which could easily be bypassed by changing the PNA sequence. These findings indicate that the specific identity of the CPP used plays a key role in determining its robustness against the evolution of resistance, and that laboratory evolution can illuminate the remaining gaps in our knowledge on the mechanisms of action of asobiotics.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 0th percentile
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A side-by-side comparison of peptide-delivered antisense antibiotics employing different nucleotide mimics
C. Ghosh, L. Popella, … J. Vogel·bioRxiv·Jul 11, 2023
- Combination treatment can hinder the evolution of resistance to antimicrobial peptides
B. Maron, J. Friedman, Z. Hayouka·bioRxiv·Mar 13, 2022
- The evolution of antimicrobial peptide resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is severely constrained by random peptide mixtures
Bernardo Antunes, Caroline Zanchi, … Jens Rolff·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 2, 2024
- Resistance to antibacterial peptide nucleic acids through altered ribosome function
Jakob Frimodt-Møller, Irene Martinez-Roman, … Anders Løbner‐Olesen·bioRxiv·Sep 9, 2026
- Activation of the Cpx-envelope stress response system promotes tolerance to antibacterials delivered by arginine-rich peptides and aminoglycosides in Escherichia coli
J. Frimodt-Moller, A. Koulouktsis, … A. Lobner-Olesen·bioRxiv·Aug 31, 2020
- Genomic signatures of experimental adaptation to antimicrobial peptides in Staphylococcus aureus
Paul R Johnston, Adam J Dobson, Jens Rolff·bioRxiv·Jul 30, 2015