Sign in
BiochemistryGigaScience
Peer-reviewed journal article

A sulfatide-centered ultra-high resolution magnetic resonance MALDI imaging benchmark dataset for MS1-based lipid annotation tools

Lars GruberiD, Stefan SchmidtiD, Thomas EnzleiniD, Carsten HopfiD

Abstract

Spatial omics techniques are indispensable for studying complex biological systems and for the discovery of spatial biomarkers. While several current matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) instruments are capable of localizing numerous metabolites at high spatial and spectral resolution, the majority of MSI data is acquired at the MS1 level only. Assigning molecular identities based on MS1 data presents significant analytical and computational challenges, as the inherent limitations of MS1 data preclude confident annotations beyond the sum formula level. To enable future advancements of computational lipid annotation tools, well-characterized benchmark - or ground truth - datasets are crucial, which exceed the scope of synthetic data or data derived from mimetic tissue models. To this end, we provide two sulfatide-centered, biology-driven magnetic resonance MSI (MR-MSI) datasets at different mass resolving powers that characterize lipids in a mouse model of human metachromatic dystrophy. This data includes an ultra-high-resolution (R [~]1,230,000) quantum cascade laser mid-infrared imaging-guided MR-MSI dataset that enables isotopic fine structure analysis and therefore enhances the level of confidence substantially. To highlight the usefulness of the data, we compared 118 manual sulfatide annotations with the number of decoy database-controlled sulfatide annotations performed in Metaspace (67 at FDR < 10%). Overall, our datasets can be used to benchmark annotation algorithms, validate spatial biomarker discovery pipelines, and serve as a reference for future studies that explore sulfatide metabolism and its spatial regulation.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.