bioRxivMicrobiology
Comparative analysis of primer-probe sets for the laboratory confirmation of SARS-CoV-2
Y. J. Jung, G.-S. Park, J. H. Moon, K. Ku, S.-H. Beak, S. Kim, E. C. Park, D. Park, J.-H. Lee, C. W. Byeon, J. J. Lee, J.-s. Maeng, S. J. Kim, S. I. Kim, B.-T. Kim, M. J. Lee, H. G. Kim
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is newly emerging human infectious diseases, which is caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2, also previously known as 2019-nCoV). Within two months of the outbreak, more than 80,000 cases of COVID-19 have been confirmed worldwide. Since the human to human transmission occurred easily and the human infection is rapidly increasing, the sensitive and early diagnosis is essential to prevent the global outbreak. Recently, World Health Organization (WHO) announced various primer and probe sets for SARS-CoV-2 previously developed in China, Germany, Hong Kong, Japan, Thailand, and USA. In this study, we compared the ability to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA among the seven primer-probe sets for N gene and the three primer-probe sets for Orf1 gene. The result of the comparative analysis represented that the 2019-nCoV_N2, N3 of USA and the ORF1ab of China are the most sensitive primer-probe sets for N and Orf1 genes, respectively. Therefore, the appropriate combination from ORF1ab (China), 2019-nCoV_N2, N3 (USA), and NIID_2019-nCOV_N (Japan) sets should be selected for the sensitive and reliable laboratory confirmation of SARS-CoV-2.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comparison of 12 molecular detection assays for SARS-CoV-2
Y. Matsumura, T. Shimizu, … M. Nagao·bioRxiv·Jun 24, 2020
- Optimized qRT-PCR approach for the detection of intra- and extracellular SARS-CoV-2 RNAs
- Evaluation Of SYBR Green Real Time PCR For Detecting SARS-CoV-2 From Clinical Samples
Marianoel Pereira-Gómez, Álvaro Fajardo, … Gonzalo Moratorio·Journal of Virological MethodsPeer-reviewed·Dec 4, 2020
- Comparative performance of four nucleic acid amplification tests for SARS-CoV-2 virus
Qi-Zhen Zhuang, Zhenzhen Li, … Yujuan Xiong·Clinical LaboratoryPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2021
- Comparison of SARS-CoV2 N gene real-time RT-PCR targets and commercially available mastermixes
J. R. Brown, D. O'Sullivan, … K. Harris·bioRxiv·Apr 17, 2020
- Validation and Comparison of a Modified CDC Assay with two Commercially Available Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Respiratory Specimen
A. Lima, V. Healer, … S. Silbert·bioRxiv·Jun 29, 2020