Sign in
Developmental BiologybioRxiv
Preprint

Thymic epithelial cell fate and potency in early organogenesis assessed by single cell transcriptional and functional analysis.

A. Chengrui, A. M. Farley, S. Palmer, D. Liu, A. I. Kousa, P. Rouse, V. Major, J. Sweetman, J. Morys, A. Corsinotti, J. Nichols, J. Ure, R. McLay, L. Boulter, J. S. Chapman, S. R. Tomlinson, C. C. Blackburn

Abstract

During development, cortical (c) and medullary (m) thymic epithelial cells (TEC) arise from the third pharyngeal pouch endoderm. Current models suggest that within the thymic primordium most TEC exist in a bipotent/common thymic epithelial progenitor cell (TEPC) state able to generate both cTEC and mTEC, at least until embryonic day 12.5 (E12.5) in the mouse. This view, however, is challenged by recent transcriptomics and genetic evidence. We therefore set out to investigate the fate and potency of TEC in the early thymus. Here using single cell (sc) RNAseq we identify a candidate mTEC progenitor population at E12.5, consistent with recent reports. Via lineage-tracing we demonstrate this population as mTEC fate-restricted, validating our bioinformatics prediction. Using potency analyses we also establish that most E11.5 and E12.5 progenitor TEC are cTEC- fated. Finally we show that overnight culture causes most if not all E12.5 cTEC-fated TEPC to acquire functional bipotency, and provide a likely molecular mechanism for this changed differentiation potential. Collectively, our data overturn the widely held view that a common TEPC predominates in the E12.5 thymus, showing instead that sublineage-primed progenitors are present from the earliest stages of thymus organogenesis but that these early fetal TEPC exhibit cell-fate plasticity in response to extrinsic factors. Our data provide a significant advance in the understanding of fetal thymic epithelial development and thus have implications for thymus-related clinical research, in particular research focussed on generating TEC from pluripotent stem cells.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISLiu '20Elsaid '20Calvo‐Asens '25Li '20Klein '22Ma '22
74% semantic matchDevelopmental Biology
Dong Liu, Anastasia I. Kousa, Kathy E. O’Neill+12 more·Development·Jan 1, 2020· 40 citations