Proteome capacity constraints favor respiratory ATP generation
Yihui SheniD, Hoang V. DinhiD, Edward R. CruziD, Catherine M. Call, Heide BaroniD, Rolf-Peter RyseckiD, Jimmy PratasiD, Arjuna M. Subramanian, Zia Fatma, Daniel WeilandtiD, Sudharsan DwaraknathiD, Tianxia Xiao, John I. HendryiD, Vinh Gia TraniD, Lifeng YangiD, Yasuo YoshikuniiD, Huimin ZhaoiD, Costas D. MaranasiD, Martin WühriD, Joshua D. RabinowitziD
Abstract
Cells face competing metabolic demands. These include efficient use of both limited substrates and limited proteome capacity, as well as flexibility to deal with different environments. Flexibility requires spare enzyme capacity, which is proteome inefficient. ATP generation can occur via fermentation or respiration. Fermentation is much less substrate-efficient, but often assumed to be more proteome efficient 1-3, thereby favoring fast-growing cells engaging in aerobic glycolysis 4-8. Here, however, we show that mitochondrial respiration is actually more proteome-efficient than aerobic glycolysis. Instead, aerobic glycolysis arises from cells maintaining the flexibility to grow also anaerobically. These conclusions emerged from an unbiased assessment of metabolic regulatory mechanisms, integrating quantitative metabolomics, proteomics, and fluxomics, of two budding yeasts, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Issatchenkia orientalis, the former more fermentative and the latter respiratory. Their energy pathway usage is largely explained by differences in proteome allocation. Each organisms proteome allocation is remarkably stable across environmental conditions, with metabolic fluxes predominantly regulated at the level of metabolite concentrations. This leaves extensive spare biosynthetic capacity during slow growth and spare capacity of their preferred bioenergetic machinery when it is not essential. The greater proteome-efficiency of respiration is also observed in mammals, with aerobic glycolysis occurring in yeast or mammalian cells that maintain a fermentation-capable proteome conducive to both aerobic and anaerobic growth.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 9
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Robustness of mitochondrial biogenesis and respiration explain aerobic glycolysis
Easun Arunachalam, Felix C. Keber, … Daniel J. Needleman·bioRxiv·Jul 4, 2024
- Proteome overabundance enables respiration but limitation onsets carbon overflow
Rahul Kumar, Aleksandr Illarionov, Petri‐Jaan Lahtvee·bioRxiv·Feb 20, 2020
- Mitochondrial efficiency determines Crabtree effect across yeasts
Julius Battjes, Pranas Grigaitis, … Bas Teusink·bioRxiv·Nov 1, 2024
- Mitochondrial respiration is required to provide amino acids during fermentative proliferation of fission yeast
Michał Małecki, Stephan Kamrad, … Jürg Bähler·EMBO ReportsPeer-reviewed·Sep 7, 2020
- The Warburg Effect is the result of faster ATP production by glycolysis than respiration
Matthew A. Kukurugya, Saharon Rosset, Denis V. Titov·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Nov 8, 2024
- Proteome dynamics during transition from exponential to stationary phase under aerobic and anaerobic conditions in yeast
Maxime den Ridder, Wiebeke van den Brandeler, … Martin Pabst·Molecular & Cellular ProteomicsPeer-reviewed·Apr 17, 2023