bioRxivMolecular BiologyPreprint
Probing DNA damage sites reveals context-dependent and novel DNA damage response factors
Richard Cardoso da SilvaiD, Davide C. RecchiaiD, Vincent Portegijs, María Cristina Trueba SáncheziD, Kelly E. SteckeriD, Sander van den HeuveliD, Tuncay BaubeciD
Abstract
DNA damage is a constant threat to genome integrity and function. Diminished capacity for DNA repair is linked to many human diseases, therefore understanding the molecular pathways responding to DNA damage is key for developing novel therapies. Lack of unbiased probes to report DNA damage dynamics and the associated proteins in living cells and animals limit our current efforts to completely understand DNA repair processes. In this study we overcome these limitations by engineering protein probes containing the tandem-BRCT domain of MCPH1, which we show to have a specific affinity for the DNA-damage-associated histone mark {gamma}H2AX. We employ these probes to track DNA damage dynamics in living cells exposed to a panel of different genotoxic insults and to visualize programmed double strand breaks during gametogenesis in living animals. We further utilize the binding selectivity of our probe to tether TurboID biotin ligases to chromatin and identify the DNA damage-associated proteome via proximity ligation. By comparing five different DNA damaging agents, we reveal the proteome associated with specific lesions, and identify multiple novel proteins with potential implications in damage response and repair. Among these novel proteins, we characterize the ubiquitin ligase UBE3A, the methyl-binding and proteasome-recruiting protein L3MBTL3, and the spliceosomal factor U2SURP, as previously uncharacterized effectors of DNA damage response. These functional datasets reveal the DNA damage-dependent proteomes and reveal novel insights into DNA damage response.
- organism: human
- assay: proteomics
- research focus: protein structure prediction
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 4
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Multi-layered chromatin proteomics identifies cell vulnerabilities in DNA repair
G. Sigismondo, L. Arseni, … J. Krijgsveld·bioRxiv·Aug 5, 2021
- Proteomic profiling of UV damage repair patches uncovers histone chaperones with central functions in chromatin repair
Alexandre Plessier, Audrey Chansard, … Sophie E. Polo·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jan 28, 2026
- A bifunctional antibody conjugate marks the location of DNA binding proteins on deproteinized DNA fibers.
Durga Pokharel, Althaf Shaik, … Michael M. Seidman·ACS OmegaPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2025
- Systematic analysis of the molecular and biophysical properties of key DNA damage response factors
J. R. Heyza, M. Mikhova, … J. C. Schmidt·bioRxiv·Jun 9, 2022
- The phosphoproteomic landscape of the DNA damage response
Francesca Conte, Matthias Ostermaier, … Petra Beli·bioRxiv·May 13, 2026
- βTrCP is involved in the localization of the MRN complex on chromatin to enhance DNA damage repair
Alejandro Belmonte‐Fernández, Joaquín Herrero‐Ruiz, … Francisco Romero·bioRxiv·Mar 6, 2025