Chromatin Accessibility Plays a Key Role in Selective Targeting of Hox Proteins
Damiano PorcelliiD, Bettina FischeriD, Steven R. H. RusselliD, Robert A. WhiteiD
Abstract
Hox protein transcription factors specify segmental diversity along the anterior-posterior body axis in metazoans. Understanding the basis of Hox function has long faced the problem that, while the different members of the Hox family show clear functional specificity in vivo, they all show very similar binding specificity in vitro. Based on in vitro studies, cofactors may increase Hox binding selectivity however a satisfactory understanding of in vivo Hox target selectivity is still lacking.\n\nWe have carried out a systematic analysis of the in vivo genomic binding profiles of all eight Drosophila Hox proteins using transient transfection in Kc167 cells to examine Hox protein targeting. We find that Hox proteins show considerable binding selectivity in vivo in the absence of the canonical Hox cofactors Extradenticle and Homothorax. Hox binding selectivity is strongly associated with chromatin accessibility; binding sites in less accessible chromatin show the highest selectivity and the different Hox proteins exhibit different propensities to bind less accessible chromatin. High Hox binding selectivity is also associated with high affinity binding regions, leading to a model where Hox proteins derive binding selectivity through an affinity-based competition with nucleosomes. Provision of the Extradenticle/Homothorax cofactors generally leads to an increase in the number of Hox binding regions and promotes the binding to regions in less accessible chromatin, however the provision of these cofactors has little effect on the overall selectivity of Hox targeting.\n\nThese studies indicate that chromatin accessibility plays a key role in Hox selectivity and we propose that relative chromatin accessibility provides a basis for subtle differences in binding specificity and affinity to generate significantly different sets of genomic targets for different Hox proteins. We suggest that this mechanism may also be relevant to other transcription factor families.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 54
- FWCI
- 3.31
- Field percentile
- top 6%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Hox binding specificity is directed by DNA sequence preferences and differential abilities to engage inaccessible chromatin.
Milica Bulajić, Divyanshi Srivastava, … Esteban O. Mazzoni·DevelopmentPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2020
- HOX13-dependent chromatin accessibility modulates the target repertoires of the HOX factors
Inès Desanlis, Yacine Kherdjemil, … Marie Kmita·bioRxiv·Oct 2, 2019
- Genome-wide binding of posterior HOXA/D transcription factors reveals subgrouping and association with CTCF
Ivana Jerković, Daniel Murad Ibrahim, … Stefan Mundlos·PLOS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 19, 2017
- Ubx orchestrates tissue identity through regional and bidirectional changes to chromatin accessibility
Ryan Loker, Jordyn E. Sanner, Richard S. Mann·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 5, 2021
- Transcription factor paralogs orchestrate alternative gene regulatory networks by context-dependent cooperation with multiple cofactors
Siqian Feng, Chaitanya Rastogi, … Richard S. Mann·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2022
- HOX paralogs selectively convert binding of ubiquitous transcription factors into tissue-specific patterns of enhancer activation
Laure Bridoux, Peyman Zarrineh, … Nicoletta Bobola·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 14, 2020