Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
SpyChIP identifies cell type-specific transcription factor occupancy from complex tissues
Abstract
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) is an important technique for characterizing protein-DNA binding in vivo. One drawback of ChIP based techniques is the lack of cell type-specificity when profiling complex tissues. To overcome this limitation, we developed SpyChIP to identify cell type-specific transcription factor (TF) binding sites in native physiological contexts without tissue dissociation or nuclei sorting. SpyChIP takes advantage of a specific covalent isopeptide bond that rapidly forms between the 15 amino acid SpyTag and the 17 kD protein SpyCatcher. In SpyChIP, the target TF is fused with SpyTag by genome engineering, and an epitope tagged SpyCatcher is expressed in cell populations of interest, where it covalently binds to SpyTag-TF. Cell type-specific ChIP is obtained by immunoprecipitating chromatin prepared from whole tissues using antibodies directed against the epitope-tagged SpyCatcher. Using SpyChIP, we identified the genome-wide binding profiles of the Hox protein Ubx in two distinct cell types of the Drosophila haltere disc. Our results revealed extensive region-specific Ubx-DNA binding events, highlighting the significance of cell type-specific ChIP and the limitations of whole tissue ChIP approaches. Analysis of Ubx::SpyChIP results provided novel insights into the relationship between chromatin accessibility and Ubx-DNA binding, as well as different mechanisms Ubx employs to regulate its downstream cis-regulatory modules (CRMs). In addition to SpyChIP, we suggest that SpyTag-SpyCatcher technology, as well as other covalent interaction peptide pairs, has many potential in vivo applications that were previously unachievable.
- organism: Drosophila
- assay: ChIP-seq
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 0.33
- Field percentile
- 45th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Dissecting the binding mechanisms of transcription factors to DNA using a statistical thermodynamics framework.
Patrick C. N. Martin, Nicolae Radu Zabet·Computational and Structural Biotechnology JournalPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2020
- Simultaneous Mapping of DNA Binding and Nucleosome Positioning with SpLiT-ChEC
Orion GB Banks, Michael J. Harms, … Laura E. McKnight·bioRxiv·Jul 3, 2023
- In vivo tissue-specific chromatin profiling in Drosophila melanogaster using GFP-tagged nuclei
Juan P P Jauregui-Lozano, Kimaya M. Bakhle, Vikki Marie Weake·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 22, 2021
- Computational identification of cell-specific variable regions in ChIP-seq data
Tommaso Andreani, Steffen Albrecht, … Miguel Angel Andrade-Navarro·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Mar 10, 2020
- Different SP1 binding dynamics at individual genomic loci in human cells
Yuko Hasegawa, Kevin Struhl·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Nov 10, 2021
- Mapping transcription factor occupancy using minimal numbers of cells in vitro and in vivo
Luca Tosti, James Ashmore, … Keisuke Kaji·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2018