Effects of Instructional Context on Neural Features of Attention during Learning Activities in Children with and without ADHD
Fang Yu ChangiD, Xinyi Zoe Mao, Maya Khalil, Mark D. RapportiD, Andrea DilloniD, Sandra K. LooiD, Jennie K. GrammeriD, Agatha LenartowicziD
Abstract
Attention is foundational to learning, yet the extent to which features of the instructional environment differentially shape attentional engagement is not well understood. Here we leveraged mobile EEG and video-coded behavioral observation to examine attentional engagement in 6 to 10 years old children with and without a diagnosis of ADHD across instructional conditions varying in delivery modality (video watching, online, in-person) and management of learning (teacher-led versus student-led). EEG measures, including alpha-band (8-12Hz) oscillations, spectral slope and offset, and behavioral measures of active engagement (AE%), passive engagement (PE%), fidgeting, off-task behavior, were examined as a function of instructional context. Attentional engagement, as indicated by higher AE%, lower alpha power, flatter spectral slope and lower offset, was greatest in student-led learning, followed by teacher-led in person learning, synchronous online learning, and asynchronous learning, respectively. Child by instructional context interactions revealed that patterns of attentional engagement were largely consistent regardless of diagnosis, with group effects observed for motor behaviors (PE%, fidgeting) but not for measures of visual attention. Similarly, age showed only main effects, whereby older children showed higher passive engagement, lower fidgeting and off-task behavior, flatter spectral slope, and lower offset. The results underscore: (i) the importance of considering environmental context, such as instructional modality and management of learning, when examining mechanisms of attention and individual differences therein, and (ii) the value of recording multiple behavioral and neural measures, as not all indices commonly assumed to reflect attention capture the same underlying processes.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Dissociable Oscillatory Alpha and Aperiodic Neural Dynamics Underlie Atypical Attentional Control in Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
Yuanjun Kong, Runhao Lu, … Yan Song·bioRxiv·Nov 4, 2026
- Top-down attention modulates auditory-evoked neural responses in neurotypical, but not ADHD, young adults
Jasmine A. C. Kwasa, Abigail L. Noyce, … Barbara G. Shinn‐Cunningham·bioRxiv·Feb 11, 2021
- Selective attention and sensitivity to auditory disturbances in a virtually-real Classroom: Comparison of adults with and without AD(H)D
Orel Levy, Shirley Libman Hackmon, … Elana Zion Golumbic·eLifePeer-reviewed·May 12, 2025
- Bringing Attention to Education: Revisiting the Neural Mechanisms of Selective Attention in Naturalistic Learning
Adi Korisky, Radhika S. Gosavi, … Bruce D. McCandliss·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2026
- Uncovering the mechanisms of real-world attentional control over the course of primary education
Nora Turoman, Ruxandra I. Tivadar, … Paweł J. Matusz·Mind Brain and EducationPeer-reviewed·Aug 31, 2021
- Distilling Trial-Level EEG Variability into Participant Representations: Neurophysiologically Constrained Graph Learning in ADHD
Rishabh Tiwari, Christian Beste, Negin Gholamipourbarough·bioRxiv·Oct 8, 2026