bioRxivCell Biology
Brefeldin A and M-COPA block the export of RTKs from the endoplasmic reticulum via simultaneous inactivation of ARF1, ARF4, and ARF5
M. Natsume, M. Niwa, S. Ichikawa, T. Okamoto, H. Tsutsui, D. Usukura, T. Murata, R. Abe, M. Shimonaka, T. Nishida, I. Shiina, Y. Obata
Abstract
Normal receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) need to reach the plasma membrane (PM) for ligand-induced activation, whereas its cancer-causing mutants can be activated before reaching the PM in organelles, such as the Golgi/trans-Golgi network (TGN). Inhibitors of protein export from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), such as brefeldin A (BFA) and 2-methylcoprophilinamide (M-COPA), can suppress the activation of mutant RTKs in cancer cells, suggesting that RTK mutants cannot initiate signaling in the ER. BFA and M-COPA block the function of ADP-ribosylation factors (ARFs) that play a crucial role in ER-Golgi protein trafficking. However, which ARFs among AFR family proteins are inhibited by BFA or M-COPA, that is, which ARFs are involved in RTKs transport from the ER, remain unclear. In this study, we showed that M-COPA blocked the export of not only KIT but also PDGFRA/EGFR/MET RTKs from the ER. ER-retained RTKs could not fully transduce anti-apoptotic signals, thereby leading to cancer cell apoptosis. Moreover, single knockdown of ARF1, ARF3, ARF4, ARF5, or ARF6 could not block ER export of RTKs, indicating that BFA/M-COPA treatment cannot be mimicked by knockdown of only one ARF member. Interestingly, simultaneous transfection of ARF1, ARF4, and ARF5 siRNAs mirrored the effect of BFA/M-COPA treatment. Consistent with these results, in vitro pulldown assays showed that BFA/M-COPA blocked the function of ARF1, ARF4, and ARF5. Taken together, these results suggest that BFA/M-COPA targets at least ARF1, ARF4, and ARF5; in other words, RTKs require the simultaneous activation of ARF1, ARF4, and ARF5 for their ER export.
- organism: human
- assay: proteomics
- research focus: cell signaling & trafficking
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Systems-level Consequences of Low RAF Abundance for EGFR-ERK Signaling
Sung Hyun Lee, Paul J. Myers, … Matthew J. Lazzara·Biophysical JournalPeer-reviewed·Jan 6, 2026
- Non-canonical EGFR signaling is essential for MAPK-mediated apical extrusion of epithelial cells
Paola Molina, Mikiyas Daniel, … Ian G. Macara·bioRxiv·May 16, 2025
- Rme-6 integrates EGFR trafficking and signalling to regulate ERK1/2 signalosome dynamics
E. Smythe, F. Alshahrani, … D. H. Murray·bioRxiv·May 5, 2023
- R-Ras coordinates reciprocal activation of ERK5 and ERK1/2 under single pathway inhibition in melanoma
Ignazia Tusa, Cosimo Mazzei, … Elisabetta Rovida·bioRxiv·Jul 20, 2026
- Translational control of AMPK activity in melanoma
Natália Vadovičová, Anna Lešková, … Stjepan Uldrijan·Cell Communication and SignalingPeer-reviewed·Apr 28, 2026
- AMPKi overcomes the paradoxical activation of CRAF driven by RAF inhibitors through blocking the 14-3-3 binding to its carboxyl-terminus