Complex structural variation is prevalent and highly pathogenic in pediatric solid tumors
I. A. E. M. van Belzen, M. C. van Tuil, S. Badloe, A. Janse, E. T. P. Verwiel, M. Santoso, S. de Vos, J. Baker-Hernandez, H. H. D. Kerstens, N. Solleveld-Westerink, M. T. Meister, J. Drost, M. M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, J. H. M. Merks, J. J. Molenaar, W. C. Peng, B. B. J. Tops, F. C. P. Holstege, P. Kemmeren, J. Y. Hehir-Kwa
Abstract
BackgroundIn pediatric cancer, structural variants (SVs) and copy number alterations can contribute to cancer initiation and progression, and hence aid diagnosis and treatment stratification. The few studies into complex rearrangements have found associations with tumor aggressiveness or poor outcome. Yet, their prevalence and biological relevance across pediatric solid tumors remains unknown. ResultsIn a cohort of 120 primary tumors, we systematically characterized patterns of extrachromosomal DNA, chromoplexy and chromothripsis across five pediatric solid cancer types: neuroblastoma, Ewing sarcoma, Wilms tumor, hepatoblastoma and rhabdomyosarcoma. Complex SVs were identified in 56 tumors (47%) and different classes occurred across multiple cancer types. Recurrently mutated regions tend to be cancer-type specific and overlap with cancer genes, suggesting that selection contributes to shaping the SV landscape. In total, we identified potentially pathogenic complex SVs in 42 tumors that affect cancer driver genes or result in unfavorable chromosomal alterations. Half of which were known drivers, e.g. MYCN amplifications due to ecDNA and EWSR1::FLI1 fusions due to chromoplexy. Recurrent novel candidate complex events include chromoplexy in WT1 in Wilms tumors, focal chromothripsis with 1p loss in hepatoblastomas and complex MDM2 amplifications in rhabdomyosarcomas. ConclusionsComplex SVs are prevalent and pathogenic in pediatric solid tumors. They represent a type of genomic variation which currently remains unexplored. Moreover, carrying complex SVs seems to be associated with adverse clinical events. Our study highlights the potential for complex SVs to be incorporated in risk stratification or exploited for targeted treatments.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The landscape of structural variation in pediatric cancer
Robert Greenhalgh, Samuel W. Brady, … Jinghui Zhang·Cancer CellPeer-reviewed·Mar 12, 2026
- Rare germline structural variants increase risk for pediatric solid tumors
Riaz Gillani, Ryan L. Collins, … Eliezer M. Van Allen·SciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 2, 2025
- Somatic structural variation targets neurodevelopmental genes and identifies SHANK2 as a tumor suppressor in neuroblastoma
Gonzalo López, Karina L. Conkrite, … Sharon J. Diskin·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2020
- Somatic structural variants driving distinct modes of oncogenesis in melanoma
J. M. Conway, R. Gillani, … E. Van Allen·bioRxiv·Nov 1, 2023
- Clustered structural variant hotspots enable oncogenic addiction and plasticity in osteosarcoma
Shreya Raman, Thorsten Kaltenbacher, … Riaz Gillani·bioRxiv·Sep 18, 2026
- The DNA methylation landscape of five pediatric-tumor types
Alyssa Parker, Badí Quinteros, Stephen Piccolo·PeerJPeer-reviewed·Jun 10, 2022