bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
The SEQC2 Epigenomics Quality Control (EpiQC) Study: Comprehensive Characterization of Epigenetic Methods, Reproducibility, and Quantification
Jonathan FooxiD, Jessica NordlundiD, Claudia LalancetteiD, Ting GongiD, Michelle R. LaceyiD, Samantha LentiD, Bradley W. LanghorstiD, V. K. Chaithanya PonnaluriiD, Louise Williams, Karthik Ramaswamy Padmanabhan, Raymond G. CavalcanteiD, Anders LundmarkiD, Daniel ButleriD, Chris Mozsary, Justin GurvitchiD, John M. GreallyiD, Masako SuzukiiD, Mark Menor, Masaki Nasu, Alicia AlonsoiD, Caroline K. SheridaniD, Andreas SchereriD, Stephen Bruinsma, Gosia GoldaiD, Agata MuszyńskaiD, , Christopher E. MasoniD
Abstract
Cytosine modifications in DNA such as 5-methylcytosine (5mC) underlie a broad range of developmental processes, maintain cellular lineage specification, and can define or stratify cancer and other diseases. However, the wide variety of approaches available to interrogate these modifications has created a need for harmonized materials, methods, and rigorous benchmarking to improve genome-wide methylome sequencing applications in clinical and basic research. Here, we present a multi-platform assessment and a global resource for epigenetics research from the FDAs Epigenomics Quality Control (EpiQC) Group. The study design leverages seven human cell lines that are designated as reference materials and publicly available from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and Genome in a Bottle (GIAB) consortium. These samples were subject to a variety of genome-wide methylation interrogation approaches across six independent laboratories, with a primary focus was on 5-methylcytosine modifications. Each sample was processed in two or more technical replicates by three whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) protocols (TruSeq DNA methylation, Accel-NGS MethylSeq, and SPLAT), oxidative bisulfite sequencing (TrueMethyl), one enzymatic deamination method (EMseq), targeted methylation sequencing (Illumina Methyl Capture EPIC), and single-molecule long-read nanopore sequencing from Oxford Nanopore Technologies. After rigorous quality assessment and comparison to Illumina EPIC methylation microarrays and testing on a range of algorithms (Bismark, BitmapperBS, BWAMeth, and GemBS), we found overall high concordance between assays (R=0.87-R0.93), differences in efficency of read mapping and CpG capture and coverage, and platform performance. The data provided herein can guide continued used of these reference materials in epigenomics assays, as well as provide best practices for epigenomics research and experimental design in future studies.
- organism: human
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- approach: benchmark study
- Citations
- 2
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- MethylBench: A comprehensive benchmark of DNA methylation profiling methods across diverse sequencing platforms
Lukas Laufer, Gilles Gasparoni, … Julia Schulze-Hentrich·bioRxiv·Aug 6, 2026
- Comparing methylation levels assayed in GC-rich regions with current and emerging methods
Dominic Guanzon, Jason P. Ross, … Yi Jin Liew·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jul 30, 2024
- A theoretical and experimental framework enables low-coverage sequencing for accurate quantification of genome-wide cytosine modification levels
Christian E. Loo, Johanna M. Fowler, … Rahul M. Kohli·NAR Genomics and BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 27, 2026
- A validation of Illumina EPIC array system with bisulfite-based amplicon sequencing
Alexandra J. Noble, John F. Pearson, … Amy J. Osborne·PeerJPeer-reviewed·Feb 10, 2021
- qBiCo: A method to assess global DNA conversion performance in epigenetics via single-copy genes and repetitive elements
Faidra Karkala, Roy B. Simons, … Athina Vidaki·Epigenetics CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jan 13, 2025
- Oxford Nanopore sequencing-based protocol to detectCpG methylation in human mitochondrial DNA
Iacopo Bicci, Claudia Calabrese, … Patrick Francis Chinnery·bioRxiv·Feb 20, 2021