henhaobio
Sign in

NAR Genomics and BioinformaticsGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article

A theoretical and experimental framework enables low-coverage sequencing for accurate quantification of genome-wide cytosine modification levels

Christian E. LooiD, Johanna M. FowleriD, Heqiao Zhu, Christopher J. KrappiD, Ruiyao ZhuiD, Marisa S. BartolomeiiD, Wanding ZhouiD, Rahul M. KohliiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

5-methylcytosine (5mC) and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) regulate gene expression and exhibit dynamic levels during development and disease. While high-depth, base-resolution studies offer the most detailed view of epigenetic landscapes, many open questions are answered by surveying changes in 5mC/5hmC levels across larger cohorts. Nonetheless, current global quantification methods, including mass spectrometry, are typically limited in accessibility, accuracy, or throughput. Here, to evaluate the viability of low-coverage sequencing as an alternative, we first computationally downsampled deeply sequenced data to resolve the three-way relationship between sequencing coverage, modification levels, and measurement error. This relationship allowed us to develop a facile online tool for error calculation and to define experimental targets: <0.24% genome coverage can quantify 5mC and low-abundance 5hmC with minimal and predictable errors (<5%). Importantly, in direct comparisons, low-depth sequencing (Sparse-Seq) demonstrated high accuracy and less variability than mass spectrometry, while distinctively preserving genomic context. Applied serially to developing mouse brains, Sparse-Seq revealed an earlier emergence of 5hmCpG compared to 5mCpH and uncovered previously overlooked, genomic feature-specific epigenetic changes. This work establishes a rigorous foundation for employing Sparse-Seq as a highly accessible approach for 5mC/5hmC quantification, enabling economical first-pass analysis of epigenetic landscapes suited for large cohort studies and new hypothesis generation.

Citations
3
FWCI
6.24
Field percentile
top 5%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISFoox '20Chen '25Silva '22Fabyanic '23Gabrieli '18Wei '24
60% semantic matchGenomics
Jonathan Foox, Jessica Nordlund, Claudia Lalancette+54 more·bioRxiv·Dec 14, 2020· 2 citations