bioRxivEvolutionary BiologyPreprint
Reverse plasticity underlies rapid evolution by clonal selection within populations of fibroblastspropagated on a novel soft substrate
P. Purkayastha, K. Pendyala, A. S. Saxena, H. Hakimjavadi, S. Chamala, P. D. Dixit, C. F. Baer, T. P. Lele
Abstract
Mechanical properties such as substrate stiffness are a ubiquitous feature of a cells environment. Many types of animal cells exhibit canonical phenotypic plasticity when grown on substrates of differing stiffness, in vitro and in vivo. Whether such plasticity is a multivariate optimum due to hundreds of millions of years of animal evolution, or instead is a compromise between conflicting selective demands, is unknown. We addressed these questions by means of experimental evolution of populations of mouse fibroblasts propagated for ~90 cell generations on soft or stiff substrates. The ancestral cells grow twice as fast on stiff substrate as on soft substrate and exhibit the canonical phenotypic plasticity. Soft-selected lines derived from a genetically diverse ancestral population increased growth rate on soft substrate to the ancestral level on stiff substrate and evolved the same multivariate phenotype. The pattern of plasticity in the soft-selected lines was opposite of the ancestral pattern, suggesting that reverse plasticity underlies the observed rapid evolution. Conversely, growth rate and phenotypes did not change in selected lines derived from clonal cells. Overall, our results suggest that the changes were the result of genetic evolution and not phenotypic plasticity per se. Whole-transcriptome analysis revealed consistent differentiation between ancestral and soft-selected populations, and that both emergent phenotypes and gene expression tended to revert in the soft-selected lines. However, the selected populations appear to have achieved the same phenotypic outcome by means of at least two distinct transcriptional architectures related to mechano-transduction and proliferation.
- organism: mouse
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: development & morphogenesis
- research focus: cell signaling & trafficking
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- How adaptive plasticity evolves when selected against
A. Rago, K. Kouvaris, … R. A. Watson·bioRxiv·Jun 5, 2018
- Physiomimetic culture bias durotaxis toward soft environments
Marina Moro-López, Roberto Alonso‐Matilla, … Raimon Sunyer·bioRxiv·Mar 26, 2026
- Phenotypic plasticity as a mechanism of cave colonization and adaptation
H. Bilandzija, B. Hollifield, … W. R. Jeffery·bioRxiv·Sep 12, 2019
- A model explaining environmental stiffness-dependent migration of fibroblasts with a focus on maturation of intracellular structures
N. Saito, T. S. Matsui, … S. Deguchi·bioRxiv·Dec 30, 2022
- Evolution of generalists by phenotypic plasticity
D. T. Fraebel, K. Gowda, … S. Kuehn·bioRxiv·Sep 8, 2019
- The molecular basis of phenotypic plasticity evolves in response to environmental predictability
C. Leung, D. Grulois, … L.-M. Chevin·bioRxiv·Oct 31, 2022