Novel epigenetic clock for fetal brain development predicts prenatal age for cellular stem cell models and derived neurons.
Leonard C. StegiD, Gemma L. ShirebyiD, Jennifer L. ImmiD, Jonathan P. DaviesiD, Alice FrankliniD, Robert J. FlynniD, Seema Chandramohan NambooriiD, Akshay BhingeiD, Aaron R. JeffriesiD, Joe BurrageiD, Grant W. A. Neilson, Emma WalkeriD, Leo PerfectiD, Jack PriceiD, Grainne Mary McAlonaniD, Deepak P. SrivastavaiD, Nicholas J. BrayiD, Emma L. CopeiD, Kimberley M. Jones, Nicholas D. AlleniD, Ehsan PishvaiD, Emma Louise DempsteriD, Katie LunnoniD, Jonathan S. MilliD, Eilis J. HannoniD
Abstract
Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and their differentiated neurons (iPSC-neurons) are a widely used cellular model in the research of the central nervous system. However, it is unknown how well they capture age-associated processes, particularly given that pluripotent cells are only present during the earliest stages of mammalian development. Epigenetic clocks utilize coordinated age-associated changes in DNA methylation to make predictions that correlate strongly with chronological age. It has been shown that the induction of pluripotency rejuvenates predicted epigenetic age. As existing clocks are not optimized for the study of brain development, we developed the fetal brain clock (FBC), a bespoke epigenetic clock trained in human prenatal brain samples in order to investigate more precisely the epigenetic age of iPSCs and iPSC-neurons. The FBC was tested in two independent validation cohorts across a total of 194 samples, confirming that the FBC outperforms other established epigenetic clocks in fetal brain cohorts. We applied the FBC to DNA methylation data from iPSCs and iPSC-derived neuronal precursor cells and neurons, finding that these cell types are epigenetically characterized as having an early fetal age. Furthermore, while differentiation from iPSCs to neurons significantly increases epigenetic age, iPSC-neurons are still predicted as being fetal. Together our findings reiterate the need to better understand the limitations of existing epigenetic clocks for answering biological research questions and highlight a limitation of iPSC-neurons as a cellular model of age-related diseases.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 34
- FWCI
- 1.72
- Field percentile
- top 14%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Epigenetic and brain age across development: Performance and associations in the MIND consortium
Marlene Staginnus, Vilte Baltramonaityte, … Esther Walton·bioRxiv·Jul 30, 2026
- NEOage clocks - Epigenetic clocks to estimate post-menstrual and postnatal age in preterm infants
Stefan Graw, Marie Camerota, … Todd M. Everson·AgingPeer-reviewed·Oct 16, 2021
- An epigenetic barrier sets the timing of human neuronal maturation
Gabriele Ciceri, Arianna Baggiolini, … Lorenz Studer·NaturePeer-reviewed·Jan 31, 2024
- Cell-type specific epigenetic clocks to quantify biological age at cell-type resolution
Huige Tong, Xiaolong Guo, … Andrew Erich Teschendorff·AgingPeer-reviewed·Dec 29, 2024
- Epigenetic clocks reveal a rejuvenation event during embryogenesis followed by aging
Csaba Kerepesi, Bohan Zhang, … Vadim N. Gladyshev·Science AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Jun 25, 2021
- Disease-associated mutations directionally modulate epigenetic age in iPSC-derived tissues
Nicholas J. Skvir, Todd W. Dowrey, … George J. Murphy·bioRxiv·Oct 4, 2026