Profiling the impact of the promoters on CRISPR-Cas12a system in human cells
Jinhe LiiD, Qinchun LiangiD, Huaping ZhouiD, Ming ZhouiD, Hongxin HuangiD
Abstract
The plasmid vector platform is the most commonly used for the expression of the versatile CRISPR-Cas technique and the promoter is a crucial element for the expression vector, thus profiling the impact of the promoters on CRISPR editors provides the basic information for the gene-editing toolkits and can be a guideline for its design. Herein, we made a parallel comparison among four commonly used promoters (CAG,[~]1700bp; EF1a core, [~]210bp; CMV, [~]500bp; and PGK, [~]500bp) in CRISPR-Cas12a system in mammalian cells to explore the impact of promoters on this powerful tool. We found that without badly damaging targeting specificity, the CAG promoter-driving Cas12a editor exhibited the most active (efficiency takes as 100%, specificity index= [~]75%) in genomic cleavage, multiplex editing, transcriptional activation, and base editing, followed by promoter CMV (efficiency=70[~]90% (vs CAG), specificity index= [~]78%), and then EF1a core and PGK (both efficiency=40[~]60%, vs CAG) but with higher specificity (specificity index= [~]84% and [~]82%, respectively). Therefore, CAG is recommended in the CRISPR-Cas12a system for the applications that need a robust editing activity but without size limitation, CMV mostly can be an alternative for CAG when requiring a smaller space, EF1a is similar to PGK with relatively high specificity, but has a smaller size, thus is more suitable for in vivo therapeutic applications. The data outlined the properties of the widely used promoters in the CRISPR-Cas12a system, which can be a guide for its applications and can be a useful resource for the gene-editing field.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 10
- FWCI
- 0.89
- Field percentile
- top 31%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comparison of DNA targeting CRISPR editors in human cells
Hongxin Huang, Weiqi Lv, … Ying Lin·bioRxiv·Oct 20, 2022
- Optimization of NLS Composition Improves CRISPR-Cas12a Editing Rates in Human Primary Cells
Kevin Luk, Pengpeng Liu, … Scot A. Wolfe·bioRxiv·Feb 1, 2022
- An engineered xCas12i with high activity, high specificity and broad PAM range
H. Zhang, X. Kong, … H. Yang·Protein & CellPeer-reviewed·Nov 15, 2022
- μCas, a novel class of miniature type-V Cas12f nucleases with diverse PAM
A. Sharrar, L. Arake de Tacca, … M. Schelle·bioRxiv·Feb 3, 2023
- CRISPR-Cas12a exhibits metal-dependent specificity switching
G. T. Nguyen, M. A. Schelling, … D. G. Sashital·bioRxiv·Nov 29, 2023
- Pervasive off-target and double-stranded DNA nicking by CRISPR-Cas12a
K. Murugan, A. Seetharam, … D. G. Sashital·bioRxiv·Jun 2, 2019