Sign in
NeuroscienceScientific Reports
Peer-reviewed journal article

Amyloid-β-induced Alteration of Fast and Localized Calcium Elevations in Cultured Astrocytes

Kaito NakataiD, Joe SakamotoiD, Kohei OtomoiD, Masanao SatoiD, Hirokazu IshiiiD, Motosuke TsutsumiiD, Ryosuke EnokiiD, Tomomi NemotoiD

Abstract

Alzheimers disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that causes cognitive decline. Uncovering the mechanisms of neurodegeneration in the early stages is essential to establish a treatment for AD. Recent research has proposed the hypothesis that amyloid-{beta} (A{beta}) oligomers elicit an excessive glutamate release from astrocytes toward synapses through intracellular free Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) elevations in astrocytes, finally resulting in neuronal dendritic spine loss. Under physiological conditions, astrocytic [Ca2+]i elevations range spatially from microdomains to network-wide propagation and temporally from milliseconds to tens of seconds. Astrocytic localized and fast [Ca2+]i elevations might correlate with glutamate release; however, the A{beta}-induced alteration of localized, fast astrocytic [Ca2+]i elevations remains unexplored. In this study, we quantitatively investigated the A{beta} dimers-induced changes in the spatial and temporal patterns of [Ca2+]i in a primary culture of astrocytes by two-photon excitation spinning-disk confocal microscopy. The frequency of fast [Ca2+]i elevations occurring locally in astrocytes ([≤]0.5 s, [≤]35 {micro}m2) and [Ca2+]i event occupancy relative to cell area significantly increased after exposure to A{beta} dimers. The effect of A{beta} dimers appeared dose-dependently above 500 nM, and these A{beta} dimers-induced [Ca2+]i elevations were primarily mediated by a metabotropic purinergic receptor (P2Y1 receptor) and Ca2+ release from the endoplasmic reticulum. Our findings suggest that the A{beta} dimers-induced alterations and hyperactivation of astrocytic [Ca2+]i is a candidate cellular mechanism in the early stages of AD.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
4
FWCI
2.55
Field percentile
top 11%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.