High-throughput functional analysis of lncRNA core promoters elucidates rules governing tissue-specificity
Kaia MattioliiD, Pieter-Jan Volders, Chiara GerhardingeriD, James Christopher LeeiD, Philipp G. MaassiD, Marta MeléiD, John L. RinniD
Abstract
Transcription initiates at both coding and non-coding genomic elements, including mRNA and long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) core promoters and enhancer RNAs (eRNAs). However, each class has different expression profiles with lncRNAs and eRNAs being the most tissue-specific. How these complex differences in expression profiles and tissue-specificities are encoded in a single DNA sequence, however, remains unresolved. Here, we address this question using computational approaches and massively parallel reporter assays (MPRA) surveying hundreds of promoters and enhancers. We find that both divergent lncRNA and mRNA core promoters have higher capacities to drive transcription than non-divergent lncRNA and mRNA core promoters, respectively. Conversely, lincRNAs and eRNAs have lower capacities to drive transcription and are more tissue-specific than divergent genes. This higher tissue-specificity is strongly associated with having less complex TF motif profiles at the core promoter. We experimentally validated these findings by testing both engineered single-nucleotide deletions and human single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in MPRA. In both cases, we observe that single nucleotides associated with many motifs are important drivers of promoter activity. Thus, we suggest that high TF motif density serves as a robust mechanism to increase promoter activity at the expense of tissue-specificity. Moreover, we find that 22% of common SNPs in core promoter regions have significant regulatory effects. Collectively, our findings show that high TF motif density provides redundancy and increases promoter activity at the expense of tissue specificity, suggesting that specificity of expression may be regulated by simplicity of motif usage.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Chromatin environment, transcriptional regulation, and splicing distinguish lincRNAs and mRNAs
Marta Melé, Kaia Mattioli, … John L. Rinn·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2017
- Production of spliced long noncoding RNAs specifies regions with increased enhancer activity
Noa Gil, Igor Ulitsky·Cell SystemsPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2018
- Deciphering Transcriptional Regulation of Human Core Promoters
Shira Weingarten-Gabbay, Ronit Nir, … Eran Segal·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2019
- An unexpected contribution of lincRNA splicing to enhancer function.
Jennifer Y. Tan, Adriano Biasini, … Ana Claudia Marques·Life Science AlliancePeer-reviewed·Feb 21, 2020
- The gene-like promoter and transcription of LTR retrotransposons.
Caleb Gooden, Xingli Li, … Shujun Ou·bioRxiv·May 12, 2026
- Characterizing nascent transcription patterns of PROMPTs, eRNAs, and readthrough transcripts in the ENCODE4 deeply profiled cell lines
Ariel McShane, Ishwarya Venkata Narayanan, … Mats E. Ljungman·bioRxiv·Apr 9, 2024