STING controls Herpes Simplex Virus in vivo independent of type I interferon induction
L. H. Yamashiro, S. C. Wilson, H. M. Morrison, V. Karalis, J.-Y. J. Chung, K. J. Chen, H. Bateup, M. L. Szpara, A. Y. Lee, J. S. Cox, R. Vance
Abstract
The Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING) pathway initiates potent immune responses upon recognition of DNA derived from bacteria, viruses and tumors. To signal, the C-terminal tail (CTT) of STING recruits TBK1, a kinase that phosphorylates serine 365 (S365) in the CTT. Phospho-S365 acts as a docking site for IRF3, a transcription factor that is phosphorylated and activated by TBK1, leading to transcriptional induction of type I interferons (IFNs). IFNs are essential for antiviral immunity and are widely viewed as the primary output of STING signaling in mammals. However, other more evolutionarily ancestral responses, such as induction of NF-{kappa}B or autophagy, also occur downstream of STING. The relative importance of the various outputs of STING signaling during in vivo infections is unclear. Here we report that mice harboring a serine 365-to-alanine (S365A) point mutation in STING exhibit normal susceptibility to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection but, unexpectedly, are resistant to Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV)-1, despite lacking STING-induced type I IFN responses. Likewise, we find Irf3-/- mice exhibit resistance to HSV-1. By contrast, resistance to HSV-1 is abolished in mice lacking the STING CTT or TBK1, suggesting that STING protects against HSV-1 upon TBK1 recruitment by the STING CTT, independent of IRF3 or type I IFNs. Interestingly, we find that STING-induced autophagy is a TBK1-dependent IRF3-independent process that is conserved in the STING S365A mice, and autophagy has previously been shown to be required for resistance to HSV-1. We thus propose that autophagy and perhaps other ancestral interferon-independent functions of STING are required for STING-dependent antiviral responses in vivo.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The porcine cGAS-STING pathway exerts an unusual antiviral function independent of IFN and autophagy
J. Zhu, S. Jiang, … F. Meurens·bioRxiv·Jul 28, 2022
- STING activation of IRF3 is tuned by PELI2 to suppress basal activation and reinforce the anti-viral response
C. Ritchie, L. Li·bioRxiv·Apr 15, 2023
- AGC Kinase Inhibitors Regulate STING Signaling Through SGK-Dependent and SGK-Independent Mechanisms
J. V. C. Cabrera, H. Dang, … A. S. Baldwin·bioRxiv·Jul 21, 2022
- STING is a key driver of Japanese encephalitis virus induced inflammatory response
Simran Chhabra, Dhruvin Patel, … Manjula Kalia·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·May 29, 2026
- Herpes Simplex Virus-1 targets the 2-3cGAMP importer SLC19A1 as an antiviral countermeasure.
Zsuzsa K Szemere, Emmanuel C. Ijezie, Eain A. Murphy·VirologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 30, 2024
- Type I interferon-dependent CCL4 is induced by a cGAS/STING pathway that bypasses viral inhibition and protects infected tissue, independent of viral burden
N. J. Parekh, T. E. Krouse, … C. C. Norbury·bioRxiv·May 2, 2019