Bisphenol S and bisphenol F are less disruptive to cardiac electrophysiology and potentially safer for use in medical products, as compared to bisphenol A
T. Prudencio, L. Swift, D. Guerrelli, B. Cooper, M. Reilly, N. Ciccarrelli, J. Sheng, R. Jaimes, N. G. Posnack
Abstract
BackgroundBisphenol A (BPA) is a high-production volume chemical that is commonly used to manufacture consumer and medical-grade plastic products. Due to its ubiquity, the general population can incur daily environmental exposure to BPA, while heightened BPA exposure has been reported in intensive care patients and industrial workers. Due to health concerns, structural analogues are being explored as replacements for BPA. ObjectiveThis study aimed to examine the direct nongenomic effects of BPA on cardiac electrophysiology and compare its safety profile to recently developed alternatives, including BPS (bisphenol S) and BPF (bisphenol F). MethodsWhole-cell voltage-clamp recordings were performed on cell lines transfected with Nav1.5, hERG, or Cav1.2. Results of single channel experiments were validated by conducting electrophysiology studies on human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CM) and intact, whole heart preparations. ResultsOf the chemicals tested, BPA was the most potent inhibitor of both fast (INa-P) and late (INa-L) sodium channel (IC50 = 55.3 and 23.6 M, respectively), L-type calcium channel (IC50 = 30.8 M) and hERG channel current (IC50 = 127 M). The inhibitory effects of BPA and BPF on L-type calcium channels were supported by microelectrode array recordings, which revealed shortening of the extracellular field potential (akin to QT interval). Further, BPA and BPF exposure impaired atrioventricular conduction in intact, whole heart experiments. BPS did not alter any of the cardiac electrophysiology parameters tested. DiscussionResults of this study demonstrate that BPA and BPF exert an immediate inhibitory effect on cardiac ion channels, and that BPS may be a safer alternative. Intracellular signaling or genomic effects of bisphenol analogues were not investigated; therefore, additional mechanistic studies are necessary to fully elucidate the safety profile of bisphenol analogues on the heart.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comparative cardiotoxicity assessment of bisphenol chemicals and estradiol using human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes
B. L. Cooper, S. Salameh, N. Posnack·bioRxiv·Sep 13, 2023
- Effects of Bisphenol A on Incidence and Severity of Cardiac Lesions in the NCTR-Sprague-Dawley Rat: A CLARITY-BPA Study
G. Robin, J. Kendziorski, S. Belcher·bioRxiv·Apr 20, 2017
- Polyunsaturated fatty acid analogues differentially affect cardiac Nav, Cav, and Kv channels through unique mechanisms
B. Bohannon, X. Wu, … H. P. Larsson·bioRxiv·Sep 19, 2019
- Lead Exposure During Differentiation Perturbs Electrophysiological Function in iPSC Derived Cardiomyocytes in a Cell Line-Dependent Manner
Kimberley E. Sala-Hamrick, Esha K Shah, … Laurie Kathleen Svoboda·bioRxiv·Oct 8, 2026
- Bisphenol-S and Bisphenol-F alter mouse pancreatic β-cell ion channel expression and activity and insulin release through an estrogen receptor ERβ mediated pathway
L. Marroqui, J. Martinez-Pinna, … A. Nadal·bioRxiv·Sep 30, 2020
- Environmentally relevant bisphenol mixtures modify heart-brain physiology, cerebrovascular structures, and transcriptomic profiles in zebrafish larvae
Shana Lallemand, Sandrine Ellero‐Simatos, … Ieremias Chousidis·bioRxiv·Oct 8, 2026