Sign in
GeneticsStem Cell Reports
Peer-reviewed journal article

Lineage-specific dynamics of erasure of X-upregulation during inactive-X reactivation

Hemant Chandru NaikiD, Deepshikha ChandeliD, Sudeshna MajumdariD, Maniteja AravaiD, Runumi Baro, Harshavardhan BViD, Kishore HariiD, Parichitran Ayyamperumal, Avinchal Manhas, Mohit Kumar JollyiD, Srimonta GayeniD

Abstract

In mammals, sex chromosome dosage is compensated through X-chromosome inactivation and active-X upregulation. It is believed that during early development, X-chromosome inactivation and active X upregulation happen in a highly coordinated fashion. However, such coordination between two X-chromosomes in other developmental contexts remains unexplored. Here, we have profiled the coordination between two X-chromosomes in female cells in different developmental contexts and cell types: pre-implantation embryos, embryonic epiblast cells, iPSC reprogramming, germ cell reprogramming, B-cell, and extra-embryonic endoderm stem (XEN) cells. Interestingly, we found that two X-chromosomes in female cells are not always coordinated; instead, it happens in a lineage-specific manner. Specially, while embryonic mouse epiblast cells, iPSC undergo erasure of X-upregulation upon reactivation of the inactive X, germ cells do not. Importantly, we show that the erasure of X-upregulation in epiblast or iPSC is potentially mediated via undifferentiated embryonic transcription Factor 1 (UTF1), which is absent or lowly expressed in late germ cells and therefore, germ cells are unable to erase upregulation. Moreover, we found that partial reactivation of the inactive X is insufficient to drive the erasure of upregulation globally, nor from their counterparts on the active X in XEN and B-cells. Finally, through a phenomenological mathematical model, we show that cross-inhibition between two X-chromosomes can reproduce the dynamics of reactivation and erasure of upregulation. Altogether, our study provides insight into the coordination between two X-chromosomes in female cells in different developmental contexts and related mechanistic aspects. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=117 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/424181v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (38K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f01b7borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9c586borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@70f8eaorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e5d000_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISArava '23Severino '22Roidor '25Borensztein '17Liu '23Huang '20
77% semantic matchGenetics
Maniteja Arava, S Majumdar, LS Sowjanya+3 more·bioRxiv·Oct 20, 2023· 2 citations