Elevated conformational dynamics makes ACKR3 activation-prone and G protein-incompetent
Kai WangiD, Tony NgoiD, Ekta KhareiD, Rezvan ChitsaziiD, Suchismita RoyiD, Christopher T. SchaferiD, Tracy M. HandeliD, Irina KufarevaiD
Abstract
The atypical receptor ACKR3 works together with the canonical chemokine receptor CXCR4 to drive cell migration along gradients of their shared agonist CXCL12. CXCR4 promotes chemotaxis by activating canonical G protein pathways and recruiting {beta}-arrestins. ACKR3 indirectly regulates CXCR4-mediated chemotaxis by scavenging CXCL12. Unlike canonical chemokine receptors, ACKR3 does not couple to G proteins and instead is 100% biased towards {beta}-arrestins. CXCR4 activation by CXCL12 is exquisitely sensitive to subtle changes in both receptor and ligand. By contrast, ACKR3 is activation-prone: it recruits {beta}-arrestins in response to many ligands and is much less sensitive to mutations, suggesting distinct activation mechanisms compared to CXCR4. To explore the basis of these differences, we compared the dynamics of ACKR3 and CXCR4 complexes with chemokines using molecular dynamic (MD) simulations. Ten-microsecond atomistic MD simulations revealed that CXCR4 adopts a stable active state when bound to WT CXCL12 but transitions to an inactive state when in complex with the antagonist variant, [P2G]CXCL12. By comparison, ACKR3 exhibits a variable transmembrane (TM) 6 state distribution and persistently "active" TM7 when complexed with either WT CXCL12 or [P2G]CXCL12, the latter retaining substantial agonistic activity at ACKR3. We further identified ligand-mediated residue interaction networks in the TM core that regulate TM6 and TM7 activation in CXCR4 but are absent or disrupted in ACKR3, resulting in less constrained receptor dynamics. These findings were validated by BRET-based assays with CXCL12 and ACKR3 mutants. Together, the data suggests that the unique conformational dynamics of ACKR3 govern its activation propensity, its ligand promiscuity, and its atypical effector coupling.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Distinct Activation Mechanisms of CXCR4 and ACKR3 Revealed by Single-Molecule Analysis of their Conformational Landscapes
C. T. Schafer, R. F. Pauszek, … D. P. Millar·bioRxiv·Oct 31, 2023
- Conformational dynamics underlying Atypical Chemokine Receptor 3 activation
O. Otun, C. Aljamous, … C. BECHARA·bioRxiv·Jul 17, 2023
- Atypical Chemokine Receptor 3 'Senses' CXC Chemokine Receptor 4 Activation Through GPCR Kinase Phosphorylation
C. T. Schafer, Q. Chen, … T. M. Handel·bioRxiv·Feb 25, 2023
- Constitutive activity of an atypical chemokine receptor revealed by inverse agonistic nanobodies
Claudia V. Perez Almeria, Omolade Otun, … Martine J. Smit·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Dec 2, 2025
- Molecular insights into intrinsic transducer-coupling bias in the CXCR4-CXCR7 system
P. Sarma, H.-J. Yoon, … A. K. Shukla·bioRxiv·Jun 6, 2022
- ACKR3 agonism induces heterodimerization with chemokine receptor CXCR4 and attenuates platelet function
Valerie Dicenta, Zoi Laspa, … Anne‐Katrin Rohlfing·European Journal of Clinical InvestigationPeer-reviewed·Oct 7, 2024