Amplification-free long read sequencing reveals unforeseen CRISPR-Cas9 off-target activity
Ida HöijeriD, Josefin JohanssoniD, Sanna GudmundssoniD, Chen-Shan ChiniD, Ignas BunikisiD, Susana Häggqvist, Anastasia EmmanouilidouiD, Maria WilbeiD, Marcel den HoediD, Marie-Louise BondesoniD, Lars FeukiD, Ulf B GyllensteniD, Adam AmeuriD
Abstract
A much-debated concern about CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing is that unspecific guide RNA (gRNA) binding may induce off-target mutations. However, accurate prediction of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target sites and activity is challenging. Here we present SMRT-OTS and Nano-OTS, two amplification-free long-read sequencing protocols for detection of gRNA driven digestion of genomic DNA by Cas9. The methods were assessed using the human cell line HEK293, which was first re-sequenced at 18x coverage using highly accurate (HiFi) SMRT reads to get a detailed view of all on- and off-target binding regions. We then applied SMRT-OTS and Nano-OTS to investigate the specificity of three different gRNAs, resulting in a set of 55 high-confidence gRNA binding sites identified by both methods. Twenty-five (45%) of these sites were not reported by off-target prediction software, either because they contained four or more single nucleotide mismatches or insertion/deletion mismatches, as compared with the human reference. We further discovered that a heterozygous SNP can cause allele-specific gRNA binding. Finally, by performing a de novo genome assembly of the HiFi reads, we were able to re-discover 98.7% of the gRNA binding sites without any prior information about the human reference genome. This suggests that CRISPR-Cas9 off-target sites can be efficiently mapped also in organisms where the genome sequence is unknown. In conclusion, the amplification-free sequencing protocols revealed many gRNA binding sites in vitro that would be difficult to predict based on gRNA sequence alignment to a reference. Nevertheless, it is still unknown whether in vivo off-target editing would occur at these sites.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 63
- FWCI
- 2.84
- Field percentile
- top 7%
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Prediction-based highly sensitive CRISPR off-target validation using target-specific DNA enrichment
Seung-Hun Kang, Wi-jae Lee, … Seung Hwan Lee·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jul 17, 2020
- A genome-wide analysis of Cas9 binding specificity using ChIP-seq and targeted sequence capture
Henriette O'Geen, Isabelle M. Henry, … David J. Segal·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Feb 20, 2015
- Strategy for detecting off-target sites in genome-edited rice
Jumpei Narushima, Shinya Kimata, … Kazunari Kondo·bioRxiv·May 28, 2021
- Direct profiling of genome-wide dCas9 and Cas9 specificity using ssDNA mapping (CasKAS)
Georgi K. Marinov, Samuel H. Kim, … William James Greenleaf·bioRxiv·Apr 16, 2021
- Systematic decomposition of sequence determinants governing CRISPR/Cas9 specificity
Rongjie Fu, Wei He, … Han Xu·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jan 25, 2022
- CRISPR-Cas off-target detection using Oxford Nanopore sequencing - is the mitochondrial genome more vulnerable to off-targets?
Sandeep Chakraborty·bioRxiv·Aug 26, 2019