Conformational Changes in the Negative Arm of the Circadian Clock Correlate with Dynamic Interactomes Involved in Post-transcriptionally Regulated Processes
Jacqueline F. PelhamiD, Alexander E. Mosier, Samuel C. Altshuler, Christopher L. Kirchhoff, William B. FalliD, Lisa Soyeon BaikiD, Joanna C. ChiuiD, Jennifer HurleyiD
Abstract
The circadian clock employs a transcriptional/translational negative feedback loop (TTFL) to anticipate environmental changes due to the Earths diurnal cycle, with regulation of organismal physiology believed to stem from temporal transcriptional activation by the positive arm. However, up to 80% of oscillating proteins do not have rhythmic mRNA, establishing circadian post-transcriptional regulation through unknown mechanisms. Given the pervasive conservation of the intrinsically disordered nature of negative-arm clock proteins, we hypothesized that post-transcriptional regulation may stem from conformational shifts in negative-arm proteins that time vacillations in the constituents of negative-arm macromolecular complexes to time cellular physiology. Our investigation of the negative arm clock protein in Neurospora crassa, FREQUENCY (FRQ), demonstrated temporal conformational fluidity correlated with daily changes in physiologically diverse macromolecular complex components. A parallel investigation of the macromolecular complexes centered around Drosophila melanogaster PERIOD (dPER) and human PERIOD (hPER2) found a similar number and physiological diversity of interacting partners in higher eukaryotes. Short linear motifs (SLiMs) associated with the interactors localized to disordered and phosphorylated regions on the PERs and FRQ, with disordered interactors oscillating in the macromolecular complexes over circadian time. This oscillation correlated with oscillations in post-transcriptionally regulated proteins, suggesting the negative arm may tune cellular physiology and proteostasis post-transcriptionally via vacillations in the circadian negative-arm macromolecular protein complexes.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 7
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The formation of a fuzzy complex in the negative arm regulates the robustness of the circadian clock.
Meaghan S. Jankowski, Daniel Griffith, … Jennifer Hurley·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Apr 25, 2024
- Phosphorylation, disorder, and phase separation govern the behavior of Frequency in the fungal circadian clock
D. Tariq, N. Maurici, … B. R. CRANE·bioRxiv·Nov 3, 2022
- CRYPTOCHROMES confer robustness, not rhythmicity, to circadian timekeeping
M. Putker, D. Wong, … J. S. O'Neill·The EMBO JournalPeer-reviewed·Jan 25, 2021
- Nardilysin fine-tunes the mammalian circadian clock through selective modulation of PER2 function
Yoshinori Hiraoka, Rina Nunokawa, … Eiichiro Nishi·bioRxiv·Aug 19, 2026
- Basal leakage in oscillation: coupled transcriptional and translational control using feed-forward loops
Ignasius Joanito, Ching‐Cher Sanders Yan, … Chao‐Ping Hsu·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 3, 2020
- Circadian proteomics reveal rampant tuning of post-transcriptional apparatus by Chlamydomonas clock
D. B. Jadhav, S. Roy·bioRxiv·Jul 28, 2023