Scalable spatial DNA sequencing from archival tissue maps copy number subclones
Cristian SoituiD, Ugur Sahin, Anette Magnussen, Ashley Wong, Willem BonnafféiD, Mengran FaniD, Merve BiliciiD, Simon DavisiD, Román FischeriD, Jasmine Reese, Toby House, Sorayya MoradiiD, Renuka Teague, Olaf AnsorgeiD, Stefano MalacrinoiD, Nasullah Khalid AlhamiD, Emma McGregor, David Maldonado‐Pérez, Ian P.M. TomlinsoniD, David C. WedgeiD, Joanna HesteriD, Fadi IssaiD, Claire Edwards, Richard Bryant, Ian Mills, , Srinivasa R. RaoiD
Abstract
Spatially resolved DNA sequencing holds promise due to its potential utility in understanding cancer intra-tumour heterogeneity and tumour evolution in relation to tissue architecture. However, it has so far been used to a limited extent due to technical challenges and high cost of existing methods. Hence we aimed to develop a high throughput spatial genomic assay to obtain copy number alteration (CNA) information at user-defined spatial resolution. We derived CNA profiles from ultra-low coverage whole genome sequencing at sub-millimetre resolution from archival samples using a novel method called Adaptive Resolution Multiscale Spatial DNA sequencing (ARMS DNAseq). We used it to profile CNAs from more than 766 regions (tiles) from 3 patients, covering a total area of over 300 mm2, with 1.2-2.6 million mapped reads per tile and tile sizes of 0.1-0.99mm2. Using ARMS DNAseq, we delineate tumour evolution in a spatial context, and identify more tumour subclones that were obscured or incompletely represented in bulk multi-region whole genome sequencing. Next, we show associations between tumour subclones and morphology, and prediction of subclone identity from deep learning-derived image representations. Finally, we demonstrate multi-omic integration by alignment with spatial transcriptomic data, showing subclone-specific immune cell co-occurrence as well as transcriptional programmes cutting across subclone boundaries. ARMS DNAseq converts low-throughput, region-by-region profiling into a scalable and adaptable workflow for direct spatial copy number profiling from archival tissue sections.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Cancer subclone detection based on DNA copy number in single cell and spatial omic sequencing data
Chi-Yun Wu, Jiazhen Rong, … Nancy Ruonan Zhang·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2025
- ClonArch: Visualizing the Spatial Clonal Architecture of Tumors
J. Wu, M. El-Kebir·bioRxiv·Apr 6, 2020
- SlideCNA: Spatial copy number alteration detection from Slide-seq-like spatial transcriptomics data
Diane Zhang, Åsa Segerstolpe, … Johanna Klughammer·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·May 2, 2025
- Spatially constrained tumour growth affects the patterns of clonal selection and neutral drift in cancer genomic data
Ketevan Chkhaidze, Timon Heide, … Andrea Sottoriva·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 29, 2019
- SPICE: A Robust Computational Framework for Identifying Copy Number Variations in Spatial Transcriptomics
Kalins Banerjee, Robert C. Langefeld, … Xiang Zhou·bioRxiv·Jul 4, 2026
- Resolving the immune response across clonal cancer evolution in situ with Atera whole transcriptome profiling
Shaocheng Wu, Mohita Mahajan, … Magdalena Matusiak·bioRxiv·Aug 21, 2026