Nucleic Acids ResearchBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Pipeline Olympics: continuable benchmarking of computational workflows for DNA methylation sequencing data against an experimental gold-standard
Yu‐Yu LiniD, Kersten BreueriD, Dieter WeichenhaniD, Pascal LafrenziD, Antonella SarnataroiD, Agata WilkiD, Maryna ChepelevaiD, Oliver Mücke, Maximilian SchönungiD, Franziska PetermanniD, Philip Reiner KenscheiD, Lena WeiseriD, Frank Thommen, Gideon Giacomelli, Karl J. V. NordströmiD, Edahí González‐AvalosiD, Angelika MerkeliD, Helene KretzmeriD, Jonas FischeriD, Stephen KrämeriD, Murat IskariD, Stephan Wolf, Ivo BuchhalteriD, Manel EstelleriD, Chris Lawerenz, , Pavlo LutsikiD
Abstract
DNA methylation is a widely studied epigenetic mark and a powerful biomarker of cell type, age, environmental exposures, and disease. Whole-genome sequencing following selective conversion of unmethylated cytosines into thymines via bisulfite treatment or enzymatic methods remains the reference method for DNA methylation profiling genome-wide. While numerous software tools facilitate processing of DNA methylation sequencing reads, a comprehensive benchmarking study has been lacking thus far. In this study, we systematically compared complete computational workflows for processing DNA methylation sequencing data using a dedicated benchmarking dataset generated with five genome-wide profiling protocols. As an evaluation reference, we employed highly quantitative locus-specific measurements from our preceding benchmark of targeted DNA methylation assays. Based on this experimental gold-standard assessment and several comprehensive metrics, we identified workflows that consistently demonstrated superior performance and revealed major workflow development trends. To facilitate the sustainability of our benchmark, we implemented an interactive workflow execution and data presentation platform, adaptable to user-defined criteria and seamlessly expandable to future software.
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: benchmark study
- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Field percentile
- top 28%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- MethylBench: A comprehensive benchmark of DNA methylation profiling methods across diverse sequencing platforms
Lukas Laufer, Gilles Gasparoni, … Julia Schulze-Hentrich·bioRxiv·Aug 6, 2026
- wgbstools: A computational suite for DNA methylation sequencing data representation, visualization, and analysis
Netanel Loyfer, Jonathan Rosenski, Tommy Kaplan·bioRxiv·May 8, 2024
- Strategies for analyzing bisulfite sequencing data
Katarzyna Wreczycka, Alexander Blume, … Altuna Akalin·Journal of BiotechnologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 16, 2017
- Performance comparison and in-silico harmonisation of commercial platforms for DNA methylome analysis by targeted bisulfite sequencing
Miljana Tanić, Ismail Moghul, … Stephan Beck·Nature BiotechnologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 2, 2022
- Comprehensive benchmarking of tools for nanopore-based detection of DNA methylation
Onkar Kulkarni, Reuben Jacob Mathew, … Divya Tej Sowpati·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jul 15, 2026
- Metheor: Ultrafast DNA methylation heterogeneity calculation from bisulfite read alignments
Dohoon Lee, Bonil Koo, … Sun Kim·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 20, 2023