bioRxivMicrobiologyPreprint
Requirement for specific bacterial genome maintenance pathways in repair of C8-linked pyrrolobenzodiazepine (PBD) bi-aryl monomer-mediated DNA damage
A. Joseph, K. Nahar, S. Daw, M. Hasan, R. Lo, T. B. K. Le, K. Rahman, A. Badrinarayanan
Abstract
Pyrrolobenzodiazepines (PBDs) are naturally occurring DNA binding compounds that possess anti-tumor and anti-bacterial activity. Chemical modifications of PBDs can result in improved DNA binding, sequence specificity and enhanced efficacy. More recently, synthetic PBD monomers have shown promise as payloads for antibody drug conjugates and antibacterial agents. The precise mechanism of action of these PBD monomers and their role in causing DNA damage remains to be elucidated. Here we characterized the damage-inducing potential of two C8-linked PBD bi-aryl monomers in Caulobacter crescentus and investigated the strategies employed by cells to repair the same. We show that these compounds cause DNA damage and efficiently kill bacteria, in a manner comparable to the extensively used DNA cross-linking agent mitomycin-C (MMC). However, in stark contrast to MMC which employs a mutagenic lesion tolerance pathway, we implicate essential functions for error-free mechanisms in repairing PBD monomer-mediated damage. We find that survival is severely compromised in cells lacking nucleotide excision repair and to a lesser extent, in cells with impaired recombination-based repair. Loss of nucleotide excision repair leads to significant increase in double-strand breaks, underscoring the critical role of this pathway in mediating repair of PBD-induced DNA lesions. Together, our study provides comprehensive insights into how mono-alkylating DNA-targeting therapeutic compounds like PBD monomers challenge cell growth, and identifies the specific mechanisms employed by the cell to counter the same.
- organism: bacteria (other)
- assay: DNA methylation
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: chromatin & epigenetic regulation
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A bacterial DNA repair pathway specific to a natural antibiotic
P. E. Burby, L. A. Simmons·bioRxiv·Sep 26, 2018
- The Conformation of the Complementary Strand and the Deformation of the DNA Groove upon DDB2 Binding Justifies the Different Repair Rates for Cyclobutane Pyrimidine Dimers.
Yani Kedjar, Cécilia Hognon, … Antonio Monari·Photochemical & Photobiological SciencesPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2026
- Division of Labor between SOS and PafBC in Mycobacterial DNA Repair and Mutagenesis
O. O. Adefisayo, P. Dupuy, … M. S. Glickman·bioRxiv·Aug 5, 2021
- DdiA, an XRE family transcriptional regulator, regulates a LexA-independent DNA damage response in Myxococcus xanthus
Jana Jung, Timo Glatter, … Lotte Søgaard‐Andersen·bioRxiv·Feb 19, 2025
- PARP1 promotes replication-independent DNA double-strand break formation after acute DNA-methylation damage
Anne Marie McMahon, Haichao Zhao, … Shan Yan·bioRxiv·Jul 10, 2025
- Spatio-temporal coordination of the DNA Double-Strand Break repair machinery in Escherichia coli
Daniel Thédié, Alessia Lepore, … Meriem El Karoui·bioRxiv·Dec 18, 2024