Nature CommunicationsCancer BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Germline variation contributes to false negatives in CRISPR-based experiments with varying burden across ancestries
S. A. Misek, A. Fultineer, J. Kalfon, J. Noorbakhsh, I. Boyle, J. Dempster, L. Petronio, K. Huang, A. Saadat, T. Green, A. Brown, J. G. Doench, D. E. Root, J. McFarland, R. Beroukhim, J. S. Boehm
Abstract
Reducing disparities is critical to promote equity of access to precision treatments for all patients with cancer. While socioenvironmental factors are a major driver behind such disparities, biological differences also are likely to contribute. The prioritization of cancer drug targets is foundational for drug discovery, yet whether ancestry-related signals in target discovery pipelines exist has not been systematically explored due to the absence of data at the appropriate scale. Here, we analyzed data from 611 genome-scale CRISPR/Cas9 viability experiments in human cell line models as part of the Cancer Dependency Map to identify ancestry-associated genetic dependencies. Surprisingly, we found that most putative associations between ancestry and dependency arose from artifacts related to germline variants that are present at different frequencies across ancestry groups. In 2-5% of genes profiled in each cellular model, germline variants in sgRNA targeting sequences likely reduced cutting by the CRISPR/Cas9 nuclease. Unfortunately, this bias disproportionately affected cell models derived from individuals of recent African descent because their genomes tended to diverge more from the consensus genome typically used for CRISPR/Cas9 guide design. To help the scientific community begin to resolve this source of bias, we report three complementary methods for ancestry-agnostic CRISPR experiments. This report adds to a growing body of literature describing ways in which ancestry bias impacts cancer research in underappreciated ways.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- assay: CRISPR screen
- research focus: drug response / drug discovery
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: experimental assay
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Integrated cross-study datasets of genetic dependencies in cancer
Clare Pacini, Joshua M. Dempster, … Francesco Iorio·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Mar 12, 2021
- Ancestry-Specific Predisposing Germline Variants in Cancer
Ninad Oak, Andrew D. Cherniack, … Kuan‐lin Huang·Genome MedicinePeer-reviewed·May 29, 2020
- Agreement between two large pan-cancer CRISPR-Cas9 gene dependency datasets
J. M. Dempster, C. Pacini, … A. Tsherniak·bioRxiv·Jun 4, 2019
- Computational correction of copy-number effect improves specificity of CRISPR-Cas9 essentiality screens in cancer cells
Robin M. Meyers, Jordan Bryan, … Aviad Tsherniak·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 30, 2017
- A benchmark of computational methods for correcting biases of established and unknown origin in CRISPR-Cas9 screening data
Alessandro Vinceti, Raffaele M Iannuzzi, … Francesco Iorio·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 19, 2024
- Multiple-gene targeting and mismatch tolerance can confound analysis of genome-wide pooled CRISPR screens
Jean‐Philippe Fortin, Jenille Tan, … Scott E. Martin·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 25, 2019