A Pooled Cell Painting CRISPR Screening Platform Enables de novo Inference of Gene Function by Self-supervised Deep Learning
Srinivasan SivanandaniD, Bobby Leitmann, Eric LubeckiD, Mohammad Muneeb SultaniD, Panagiotis Stanitsas, Navpreet RanuiD, Alexis Ewer, Jordan E. MancusoiD, Zachary F. PhillipsiD, Albert M. KimiD, John W. Bisognano, John Cesarek, Fiorella RuggiuiD, David Feldman, Daphne KolleriD, Eilon SharoniD, Ajamete KaykasiD, Max R. SalickiD, Ci ChuiD
Abstract
Pooled CRISPR screening has emerged as a powerful method of mapping gene functions thanks to its scalability, affordability, and robustness against well or plate-specific confounders present in array-based screening 1-6. Most pooled CRISPR screens assay for low dimensional phenotypes (e.g. fitness, fluorescent markers). Higher-dimensional assays such as perturb-seq are available but costly and only applicable to transcriptomics readouts 7-11. Recently, pooled optical screening, which combines pooled CRISPR screening and microscopy-based assays, has been demonstrated in the studies of the NFkB pathway, essential human genes, cytoskeletal organization and antiviral response 12-15. While the pooled optical screening methodology is scalable and information-rich, the applications thus far employ hypothesis-specific assays. Here, we enable hypothesis-free reverse genetic screening for generic morphological phenotypes by re-engineering the Cell Painting 16 technique to provide compatibility with pooled optical screening. We validated this technique using well-defined morphological genesets (124 genes), compared classical image analysis and self-supervised learning methods using a mechanism-of-action (MoA) library (300 genes), and performed discovery screening with a druggable genome library (1640 genes) 17. Across these three experiments we show that the combination of rich morphological data and deep learning allows gene networks to emerge without the need for target-specific biomarkers, leading to better discovery of gene functions.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 35
- FWCI
- 8.26
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Brieflow: An Integrated Computational Pipeline for High-Throughput Analysis of Optical Pooled Screening Data
Matteo Di Bernardo, Roshan Kern, … Iain M. Cheeseman·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·May 30, 2026
- High-content Imaging-based Pooled CRISPR Screens in Mammalian Cells
X. Yan, N. Stuurman, … R. Vale·bioRxiv·Jun 30, 2020
- Pooled CRISPR screening with single-cell transcriptome read-out
Paul Datlinger, André F. Rendeiro, … Christoph Bock·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Jan 18, 2017
- CRISPRmap: Sequencing-free optical pooled screens mapping multi-omic phenotypes in cells and tissue
Jiacheng Gu, Abhishek Iyer, … Jellert T. Gaublomme·bioRxiv·Dec 26, 2023
- Mapping variation in the morphological landscape of human cells with optical pooled CRISPRi screening
R. L. D. Labitigan, A. L. Sanborn, … J. A. Theriot·bioRxiv·Dec 27, 2022
- Image-based pooled whole genome CRISPR screening for Parkin and TFEB subcellular localization
G. kanfer, S. A. Sarraf, … R. J. Youle·bioRxiv·Jul 2, 2020