Orthogonal CRISPR-Cas tools for genome editing, inhibition, and CRISPR recording in zebrafish embryos.
Paige Takasugi, Shengzhou Wang, Kimberly T. TruongiD, Evan P. Drage, Sahar N. Kanishka, Marissa A. Higbee, Nathan BamideleiD, Ogooluwa OjelabiiD, Erik J. SontheimeriD, James A. GagnoniD
Abstract
The CRISPR-Cas universe continues to expand. The type II CRISPR-Cas system from Streptococcus pyogenes (SpyCas9) is the most widely used for genome editing due to its high efficiency in cells and organisms. However, concentrating on a single CRISPR-Cas system imposes limits on target selection and multiplexed genome engineering. We hypothesized that CRISPR-Cas systems originating from different bacterial species could operate simultaneously and independently due to their distinct single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs) or CRISPR-RNAs (crRNAs), and protospacer adjacent motifs (PAMs). Additionally, we hypothesized that CRISPR-Cas activity in zebrafish could be regulated through the expression of inhibitory anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins. Here, we use a simple mutagenesis approach to demonstrate that CRISPR-Cas systems from Streptococcus pyogenes (SpyCas9), Streptococcus aureus (SauCas9), Lachnospiraceae bacterium (LbaCas12a, previously known as LbCpf1), are orthogonal systems capable of operating simultaneously in zebrafish. CRISPR systems from Acidaminococcus sp. (AspCas12a, previously known as AsCpf1) and Neisseria meningitidis (Nme2Cas9) were also active in embryos. We implemented multichannel CRISPR recording using three CRISPR systems and show that LbaCas12a may provide superior information density compared to previous methods. We also demonstrate that type II Acrs (anti-CRISPRs) are effective inhibitors of SpyCas9 in zebrafish. Our results indicate that at least five CRISPR-Cas systems and two anti-CRISPR proteins are functional in zebrafish embryos. These orthogonal CRISPR-Cas systems and Acr proteins will enable combinatorial and intersectional strategies for spatiotemporal control of genome editing and genetic recording in animals.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 22
- FWCI
- 1.10
- Field percentile
- top 24%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evaluation of CRISPR gene-editing tools in zebrafish
José M. Uribe‐Salazar, Gulhan Kaya, … Megan Y. Dennis·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jan 5, 2022
- Enhance genome editing efficiency and specificity by a quick CRISPR/Cas9 system
Yingying Hu, Zhou Luo, … Huanming Yang·bioRxiv·Aug 2, 2019
- Expanding The CRISPR Toolbox With Mad7 In Zebrafish And Human Cells
Wesley A. Wierson, Brandon W. Simone, … Jeffrey J. Essner·The CRISPR JournalPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2019
- Enhanced RNA-targeting CRISPR-Cas technology in zebrafish
Ismael Moreno-Sánchez, Luis Hernández-Huertas, … Miguel A. Moreno-Mateos·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Mar 16, 2025
- Spatiotemporal Control of CRISPR/Cas9 Function in Cells and Zebrafish using Light-Activated Guide RNA
Wenyuan Zhou, Wes Brown, … Alexander Deiters·Angewandte Chemie International EditionPeer-reviewed·Mar 11, 2020
- Efficient genome editing using modified Cas9 proteins in zebrafish
Laura Dorner, Benedikt Stratmann, … Uwe Irion·Biology OpenPeer-reviewed·Mar 28, 2024