Sign in
NeuroscienceJournal of Neuroscience
Peer-reviewed journal article

Stabilization of spine Synaptopodin by mGluR1 is required for mGluR-LTD

Luisa SperanzaiD, Yanis InglebertiD, Claudia De SanctisiD, Pei You WuiD, Magdalena KalinowskaiD, R. Anne McKinney, Anna FrancesconiiD

Abstract

Dendritic spines, actin-rich protrusions forming the postsynaptic sites of excitatory synapses, undergo activity-dependent molecular and structural remodeling. Activation of group 1 metabotropic glutamate receptors - mGluR1 and mGluR5 - by synaptic or pharmacological stimulation, induces LTD but whether this is accompanied with spine elimination remains unresolved. A subset of telencephalic mushroom spines contains the spine apparatus (SA), an enigmatic organelle composed of stacks of smooth endoplasmic reticulum, whose formation depends on the expression of the actin-bundling protein Synaptopodin. Allocation of Synaptopodin to spines appears governed by cell-intrinsic mechanisms as the relative frequency of spines harboring Synaptopodin is conserved in vivo and in vitro. Here we show that expression of Synaptopodin/SA in spines is required for induction of mGluR-LTD at Schaffer collateral-CA1 synapses. Post-mGluR-LTD, mushroom spines lacking Synaptopodin/SA are selectively lost whereas spines harboring it are preserved, a process dependent on activation of mGluR1 but not mGluR5. Mechanistically, we find that mGluR1 supports physical retention of Synaptopodin within excitatory spine synapses during LTD while triggering lysosome-dependent degradation of the protein residing in dendritic shafts. Together, these results reveal a cellular mechanism, dependent on mGluR1, which enables selective preservation of stronger spines containing Synaptopodin/SA while eliminating weaker ones and potentially countering spurious strengthening by de novo recruitment of Synaptopodin. Overall our results identify spines with Synaptopodin/SA as the locus of mGluR-LTD and underscore the importance of the molecular microanatomy of spines in synaptic plasticity.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
17
FWCI
1.44
Field percentile
top 21%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISWu '24Inglebert '24Fanutza '25Yap '20Wang '25Pérez‐Alvar '20
88% semantic matchNeuroscience
Pei You Wu, Linjia Ji, Claudia De Sanctis+3 more·PNAS Nexus·Feb 1, 2024· 8 citations