Genome biologyMolecular BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Systematic comparison of dCas9-based DNA methylation epimodifiers over time indicates efficient on-target and widespread off-target effects
Majid Pahlevan KakhkiiD, Fatemeh Rangani, Ewoud EwingiD, Chiara Starvaggi CucuzzaiD, Galina Yurevna ZheleznyakovaiD, Maria Kalomoiri, Lea Kenny, Anika Raghavan, Chandana Rao Prakash, Gabe van den Hoeven, T. S., Ruxandra CovacuiD, Ioanna AndreouiD, Maria NeedhamseniD, Lara KulariD, M Jagodic
Abstract
CRISPR/dCas9-based epigenome editing systems, including DNA methylation epimodifiers, have greatly advanced molecular functional studies revolutionizing their precision and applicability. Despite their promise, challenges such as the magnitude and stability of the on-target editing and unwanted off-target effects underscore the need for improved tool characterization and design. We systematically compared specific targeting of the BACH2 gene promoter and genome-wide off-target effects of available and novel dCas9-based DNA methylation editing tools over time. We demonstrate that multimerization of the catalytic domain of DNA methyltransferase 3A enhances editing potency but also induces widespread, early methylation deposition at low-to-medium methylated promoter-related regions with specific gRNAs and, interestingly, also with non-targeting gRNAs. A small fraction of the methylation changes associated with transcriptional dysregulation and mapped predominantly to bivalent chromatin associating both with transcriptional repression and activation. Additionally, specific non-targeting control gRNA caused pervasive and long-lasting methylation-independent transcriptional alterations particularly in genes linked to RNA and energy metabolism. CRISPRoff emerged as the most efficient tool for stable targeting of the BACH2 promoter, with fewer and less stable off-target effects compared to other epimodifiers but with persistent transcriptome alterations. Our findings highlight the delicate balance between potency and specificity of epigenome editing and provide critical insights into the design and application of future tools to improve their precision and minimize unintended consequences.
- organism: human
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: cell-cell communication
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 18.47
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A modular dCas9-SunTag DNMT3A epigenome editing system overcomes pervasive off-target activity of direct fusion dCas9-DNMT3A constructs
Christian Pflueger, Dennis Eng Kiat Tan, … Ryan Lister·bioRxiv·Feb 15, 2018
- Locus-Specific DNA Methylation Editing in Mammalian Cells using a CRISPR-Based System
Jim Smith, Rakesh Banerjee, … Aniruddha Chatterjee·bioRxiv·Oct 12, 2021
- Concurrent Genome and Epigenome Editing by CRISPR-Mediated Sequence Replacement
Jes Alexander, Gregory M. Findlay, … Jay Shendure·BMC BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 18, 2019
- Transgenic dCas9-DNMT3A mouse lines enable ex vivo and in vivo methylation editing with locus-dependent transcriptional effects
Maria Kalomoiri, Chiara Sorini, … Maja Jagodic·bioRxiv·Jun 30, 2026
- Transgenic mice for in vivo epigenome editing with CRISPR-based systems
Matthew P. Gemberling, Keith Siklenka, … Charles A. Gersbach·bioRxiv·Mar 8, 2021
- Tailoring a CRISPR/Cas-based Epi-editor for Decreased Cytotoxicity and Enzymatic Specificity
Jacob Goell, Jing Li, … Isaac B. Hilton·bioRxiv·Sep 22, 2024