bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
Bacterial DNA methylation amplifies the shared A-to-G and G-to-A substitution bias in nanopore sequencing
Xudong LiuiD, Qiutao DingiD, Yanwen ShaoiD, Zhihao GuoiD, Ying NiiD, Lu FaniD, Yi YangiD, Kaixin Chen, 杨梦苏, Runsheng LiiD
Abstract
Nanopore sequencing enables direct analysis of native DNA modifications, but these modifications can also introduce systematic basecalling errors. Here, we investigated how bacterial DNA methylation contributes to nanopore substitution errors using matched native whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and methylation-depleted whole-genome amplification (WGA) datasets from six bacterial species across CycloneSEQ (CS) and Oxford Nanopore Technologies platforms (ONT). Adenine-to-guanine (A2G) and guanine-to-adenine (G2A) substitutions were consistently enriched across species, nanopore platforms, sequencing configurations, and basecalling models, indicating a shared nanopore-associated substitution bias. This enrichment remained detectable in WGA reads, whereas native WGS reads showed a further increase. Using independent PacBio methylation profiling, we found that the WGS-associated substitution excess was strongly concentrated around bacterial methylation motifs and was minimal in non-motif regions. The magnitude and substitution pattern of these errors varied among motifs and sequencing platforms. At a subset of motif-associated positions, alternative-base fractions exceeded 50%, producing SNP-like signals. In ONT data, 28 WGS-specific calls survived the applied SNP-calling filters, all within PacBio-supported methylation contexts, and most showed significant strand imbalance. Together, these results identify a shared A2G/G2A substitution bias in all nanopore datasets and support a methylation-associated increase in these errors near bacterial methylation motifs, with some loci producing SNP-like artifacts.
- organism: bacteria (other)
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Nanopore detection of bacterial DNA base modifications
Alexa B. R. McIntyre, Noah Alexander, … Christopher E. Mason·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Feb 4, 2019
- Correcting Modification-Mediated Errors in Nanopore Sequencing by Nucleotide Demodification and in silico Correction
Chien‐Shun Chiou, Bo-Han Chen, … Yao‐Ting Huang·bioRxiv·May 20, 2022
- Decoding bacterial methylomes in four public health-relevant microbial species: Nanopore sequencing enables reproducible analysis of DNA modifications
Valentina Galeone, Johanna Dabernig‐Heinz, … Martin Hölzer·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Apr 23, 2025
- High Accuracy Base Calls in Nanopore Sequencing
Philippe C. Faucon, Robert P. Treviño, … Xiao Wang·International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Science (ICBBS)Peer-reviewed·Jun 22, 2017
- Comprehensive benchmarking of tools for nanopore-based detection of DNA methylation
Onkar Kulkarni, Reuben Jacob Mathew, … Divya Tej Sowpati·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jul 15, 2026
- Estimating DNA methylation potential energy landscapes from nanopore sequencing data
Jordi Abante, Sandeep Kambhampati, … John I. Goutsias·bioRxiv·Feb 22, 2021