henhaobio
Sign in

G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article

Massive contractions of Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2-associated CCTG tetranucleotide repeats occur via double strand break repair with distinct requirements for helicases

David Papp, Luis C. Hernandez, Theresa A. Mai, Terrance James HaaneniD, Meghan A O’Donnell, Ariel T. Duran, Sophia M. HernandeziD, Jenni E. Narvanto, Berenice Arguello, Marvin OnwukweiD, Kara Kolar, Sergei M. MirkiniD, Jane C. KimiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2 (DM2) is a genetic disease caused by expanded CCTG DNA repeats in the first intron of CNBP. The number of CCTG repeats in DM2 patients ranges from 75-11,000, yet little is known about the molecular mechanisms responsible for repeat expansions or contractions. We developed an experimental system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that enables selection of large-scale contractions of (CCTG)100 within the intron of a reporter gene and subsequent genetic analysis. Contractions exceeded 80 repeat units, causing the final repetitive tract to be well below the threshold for disease. We found that Rad51 and Rad52 are required for these massive contractions, indicating a mechanism that involves homologous recombination. Srs2 helicase was shown previously to stabilize CTG, CAG, and CGG repeats. Loss of Srs2 did not significantly affect CCTG contraction rates in unperturbed conditions. In contrast, loss of the RecQ helicase Sgs1 resulted in a 6-fold decrease in contraction rate with specific evidence that helicase activity is required for large-scale contractions. Using a genetic assay to evaluate chromosome arm loss, we determined that CCTG and reverse complementary CAGG repeats elevate the rate of chromosomal fragility compared to a low-repeat control. Overall, our results demonstrate that the genetic control of CCTG repeat contractions is notably distinct among disease-causing microsatellite repeat sequences.

Citations
4
FWCI
0.48
Field percentile
top 43%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISMosbach '20Bétemps '23Alfano '22Śledziński '24Lameiras '24Buendía '20
65% semantic matchGenetics
Valentine Mosbach, David Viterbo, Stéphane Descorps‐Declère+3 more·PLoS Genetics·Jul 16, 2020· 20 citations