eLifeGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Use of a ubiquitous gene-editing tool in budding yeast causes off-target repression of neighboring gene protein synthesis
Emily Nicole PowersiD, Charlene Chan, Ella Doron‐MandeliD, Lidia Llacsahuanga Allcca, Jenny Kim Kim, Marko JovanovićiD, Gloria Ann BrariD
Abstract
Precision genome-editing approaches have long been available in budding yeast, enabling introduction of gene deletions, epitope tag fusions, and promoter swaps through a selection-based strategy. Such approaches allow loci to be modified without disruption of coding or regulatory sequences of neighboring genes. Use of this approach to delete DBP1 however, led to silencing of expression and the resultant loss of function for the neighboring gene MRP51. We found that insertion of a resistance cassette to delete DBP1, drove a 5 extended alternative transcript for MRP51 which dampened Mrp51 protein synthesis. Misregulation of MRP51 occurred through an integrated transcriptional and translational repressive long undecoded transcript isoform (LUTI)-based mechanism that was recently shown to naturally regulate gene expression in yeast and other organisms. Cassette-induced MRP51 repression drove all mutant phenotypes we detected in cells deleted for DBP1. Selection cassette-mediated aberrant transcription events are not specific to this locus or a unique cassette but can be prevented by insertion of transcription insulators flanking the cassette. Our study suggests the existence of confounding off-target mutant phenotypes resulting from misregulated neighboring loci following genome edits in yeast. Furthermore, features of LUTI-based regulation are broadly conserved to eukaryotic organisms which indicates the potential that similar misregulation could be unnoticed in other edited organisms as well.
- organism: yeast
- assay: DNA methylation
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: protein structure prediction
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 20
- FWCI
- 1.22
- Field percentile
- top 22%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A standard knockout procedure alters expression of adjacent loci at the translational level
Artyom A. Egorov, Alexander I. Alexandrov, … Sergey E. Dmitriev·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Sep 15, 2021
- Highly efficient CRISPR gene editing in yeast enabled by double selection
Philippe C Després, Alexandre K. Dubé, … Christian R. Landry·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2018
- Targeted mutagenesis of specific genomic DNA sequences in animals for the in vivo generation of variant libraries
Julia Falo Sanjuan, Yuliana Diaz-Tirado, … Hernán G. García·bioRxiv·Jun 10, 2024
- Allele-specific genome editing using CRISPR-Cas9 causes off-target mutations in diploid yeast
Arthur R. Gorter de Vries, Lucas G. F. Couwenberg, … Jean-Marc G Daran·bioRxiv·Aug 22, 2018
- gEL DNA, a cloning- and PCR-free method for CRISPR-based multiplexed genome editing
Paola Randazzo, Nicole Xanthe Bennis, … Pascale A. S. Daran-Lapujade·The CRISPR JournalPeer-reviewed·Apr 26, 2021
- Functional and transcriptional profiling of non-coding RNAs in yeast reveal context-dependent phenotypes and widespread in trans effects on the protein regulatory network
Laura Natalia Balarezo-Cisneros, Steven Parker, … Daniela Delneri·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 25, 2021