Chromatin states contribute to coordinated allelic transcriptional bursting to drive iPSC reprogramming
Parichitran Ayyamperumal, Hemant Chandru NaikiD, Amlan Jyoti Naskar, Lakshmi Sowjanya Bammidi, Srimonta GayeniD
Abstract
Molecular mechanisms behind the reprogramming of somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) remain poorly understood. While dynamic changes in gene expression are considered to drive reprogramming, the contribution of individual alleles of genes to reprogramming remains unexplored. It is thought that two alleles of a gene can transcribe independently or coordinatedly, which in turn can lead to temporal expression heterogeneity with potentially distinct impacts on cell fate. Here, we profiled genome-wide transcriptional burst kinetics with an allelic resolution during the reprogramming of mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) to iPSC. We show that many genes involved in iPSC reprogramming pathways exhibit bursty expression and contribute to dynamic autosomal random monoallelic expression (aRME). Moreover, we find that the degree of coordination of allelic bursting differs among genes and changes dynamically during iPSC reprogramming. Importantly, we show that alleles of many reprogramming-related genes burst in a highly coordinated fashion. ATAC-seq analysis revealed that coordination of allelic bursting is linked to allelic chromatin accessibility. Consistently, we show that highly coordinated genes are enriched with chromatin accessibility regulators such as H3K36me3, H3K27ac, histone variant H3.3 and BRD4. Collectively, our study demonstrates that chromatin states contribute to coordinated allelic bursting to fine-tune the expression of genes involved in iPSC reprogramming and provides insights into the implications of allelic bursting coordination in cell fate specification. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=195 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/548864v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (45K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@162ec20org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@17c2db0org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@19b9d59org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1775052_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 10
- FWCI
- 1.09
- Field percentile
- top 27%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Cellular reprogramming dynamics follow a simple one-dimensional reaction coordinate
Sai Teja Pusuluri, Alex H. Lang, … Horacio E. Castillo·bioRxiv·Jun 9, 2015
- Dynamic Erasure of Random X-Chromosome Inactivation during iPSC Reprogramming
Adrian Janiszewski, Irene Talón, … Vincent Pasque·bioRxiv·Feb 9, 2019
- Epigenomic heterogeneity and spatial organization during human reprogramming
Terence W. Li, Justin Langerman, … Kathrin Plath·bioRxiv·Oct 21, 2026
- Defining reprogramming checkpoints from single-cell analysis of induced pluripotency
Khoa A. Tran, Stefan Pietrzak, … Rupa Sridharan·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2019
- High-Resolution Dissection of Conducive Reprogramming Trajectory to Ground State Pluripotency
Asaf Zviran, Nofar Mor, … Jacob H. Hanna·bioRxiv·Sep 7, 2017
- NCOR1 AND OCT4 FACILITATE EARLY REPROGRAMMING BY CO-SUPPRESSING FIBROBLAST GENE EXPRESSION
Georgina Peñalosa-Ruiz, Klaas W. Mulder, Gert Jan C. Veenstra·PeerJPeer-reviewed·Apr 22, 2020