BloodCancer BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Core binding factor leukemia hijacks T-cell prone PU.1 antisense promoter
E. van der Kouwe, G. Heller, A. Czibere, L. H. Castilla, R. Delwel, A. Di Ruscio, A. K. Ebralidze, M. Forte, L. Kazianka, C. Kornauth, T. Le, K. Lind, I. A. Monteiro Barbosa, A. Pichler, J. A. Pulikkan, A.-S. Schmolke, H. Sill, W. Sperr, A. Spittler, B. Q. Trinh, P. Valent, K. Vanura, R. S. Welner, J. Zuber, D. G. Tenen, P. B. Staber
Abstract
Summary paragraphThe blood system serves as a key model for cell differentiation and cancer. It is orchestrated by precise spatiotemporal expression of the hematopoietic master regulator PU.11-4. PU.1 gene expression is regulated through enhancer-promoter interactions within a topologically associated domain (TAD)5,6. PU.1 levels increase during myeloid differentiation while failure to do so results in myeloid leukemia7. In contrast, T-cell differentiation requires PU.1 to be completely switched off8-10. Little is known about the precise mechanisms of PU.1 repression, physiological as in T-cell differentiation, or pathological as in leukemia. Here we demonstrate that the down-regulation of PU.1 mRNA is a dynamic process involving an alternative promoter11 in intron 3 that is induced by RUNX transcription factors driving noncoding antisense transcription. Core binding factor (CBF) fusions, RUNX1-ETO and CBF{beta}-MYH11 in t(8;21) and inv(16) acute myeloid leukemia (AML)12, activate the PU.1 antisense promoter, thus shifting from sense towards antisense transcription and blocking myeloid differentiation. In patients with CBF-AML, we found that an elevated antisense/sense ratio represents a hallmark compared to normal karyotype AML or healthy CD34+ cells. Competitive interaction of the enhancer with the proximal or the antisense promoter are at the heart of differential PU.1 expression during myeloid and T-cell development. Leukemic CBF fusions thus utilize a physiologic mechanism employed by T-cells to decrease sense PU.1 transcription. Our results identify the first example of a sense/antisense promoter competition as a crucial functional switch for gene expression perturbation by oncogenes. This novel basic disease mechanism reveals a previously unknown Achilles heel for future precise therapeutic targeting of oncogene-induced chromatin remodeling.
- organism: human
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: chromatin & epigenetic regulation
- research focus: cancer & tumor microenvironment
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- CBFβ-MYH11 interferes with megakaryocyte differentiation via modulating a gene program that includes GATA2 and KLF1
G. Yi, A. Mandoli, … J. H. A. Martens·bioRxiv·Oct 29, 2018
- An integrated DNA interactome and transcriptome profiling reveals a PU.1/enhancer RNA-mediated Feed-forward Regulatory Loop Regulating monocyte/macrophage development and innate immune functions
A. S. M. Waliullah, Kevin Qiu, … Bon Q. Trinh·bioRxiv·Feb 19, 2025
- Integrating cell-state and enhancer constraints discriminates models of PU.1 regulation during hematopoietic differentiation
Yujia Zhang, Oleg A. Igoshin·bioRxiv·Oct 4, 2026
- Myeloid lncRNA LOUP Mediates Opposing Regulatory Effects of RUNX1 and RUNX1-ETO in t(8;21) AML
B. Q. Trinh, S. Ummarino, … D. G. Tenen·bioRxiv·Jul 24, 2020
- 3D genome remodelling underlies PU.1-dependent granulocyte maturation
Wendy Jia, Timothy M. Johanson, … Hannah D. Coughlan·bioRxiv·Jul 21, 2026
- Transcription factor PU.1 enforces quiescence and limits hematopoietic stem cell expansion during inflammatory stress
J. S. Chavez, J. L. Rabe, … E. M. Pietras·Journal of Experimental MedicinePeer-reviewed·Apr 15, 2021