Sign in
NeuroscienceTranslational Psychiatry
Peer-reviewed journal article

Lost in translation: No effect of repeated optogenetic cortico-striatal stimulation on compulsivity in rats

Amanda Ribeiro de OliveiraiD, Adriano E. ReimeriD, Gregory J. SimandliD, Sumedh Sopan NagraleiD, Alik S. WidgeiD

Abstract

BACKGROUNDThe orbitofrontal cortex-ventromedial striatum (OFC-VMS) circuitry is widely believed to drive compulsive behavior. Hyperactivating this pathway in inbred mice produces excessive and persistent self-grooming, which has been considered a model for human compulsivity. We aimed to replicate these findings in outbred rats, where there are few reliable compulsivity models. METHODS27 male Long-Evans rats implanted with optical-fibers into VMS and with opsins delivered into OFC received optical stimulation at parameters that produce OFC-VMS plasticity and compulsive grooming in mice. We then evaluated rats for compulsive self-grooming at six timepoints: before, during, immediately after and one hour after each stimulation, one and two weeks after the ending of a 6-day stimulation protocol. To further test for effects of OFC-VMS hyperstimulation, we ran animals in three standard compulsivity assays: marble burying, nestlet shredding, and operant attentional setshifting. RESULTSOFC-VMS stimulation did not increase self-grooming or induce significant changes in nestlet shredding, marble burying, or set-shifting in rats. Follow-on evoked potential studies verified that the mouse protocol did alter OFC-VMS synaptic weighting. CONCLUSIONSIn sum, although physiological changes were observed in the OFC-VMS circuitry, we could not reproduce in a strongly powered study in rats a model of compulsive behavior previously reported in mice. If optogenetic effects on behavior do not reliably transfer between rodent species, this may have important implications for designing rodent-to-human translational pipelines.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
15
FWCI
1.53
Field percentile
top 17%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISPiantadosi '24Mondragón-G '22Boom '22Seiler '22Casado-Sain '21Davis '20
70% semantic matchNeuroscience
Sean C. Piantadosi, Elizabeth E. Manning, Brittany L. Chamberlain+6 more·Nature Communications·May 24, 2024· 39 citations