Promoter repression and 3D-restructuring resolves divergent developmental gene expression in TADs
Alessa R. RingeliD, Quentin SzaboiD, Andrea M. ChiarielloiD, Konrad ChudzikiD, Robert Schöpflin, Patricia RotheiD, Alexandra L. MatteiiD, Tobias ZehnderiD, Dermot HarnettiD, Verena Laupert, Simona BiancoiD, Sara HetzeliD, Mai H.Q. Phan, Magdalena SchindleriD, Daniel M. IbrahimiD, Christina PaliouiD, Andrea EspositoiD, Cesar A. Prada‐MedinaiD, Stefan A. HaasiD, Peter GiereiD, Martin VingroniD, Lars WittleriD, Alexander MeissneriD, Mario NicodemiiD, Giacomo CavalliiD, , Michael I. RobsoniD
Abstract
Cohesin loop extrusion facilitates precise gene expression by continuously driving promoters to sample all enhancers located within the same topologically-associated domain (TAD). However, many TADs contain multiple genes with divergent expression patterns, thereby indicating additional forces further refine how enhancer activities are utilised. Here, we unravel the mechanisms enabling a new gene, Rex1, to emerge with divergent expression within the ancient Fat1 TAD in placental mammals. We show that such divergent expression is not determined by a strict enhancer-promoter compatibility code, intra-TAD position or nuclear envelope-attachment. Instead, TAD-restructuring in embryonic stem cells (ESCs) separates Rex1 and Fat1 with distinct proximal enhancers that independently drive their expression. By contrast, in later embryonic tissues, DNA methylation renders the inactive Rex1 promoter profoundly unresponsive to Fat1 enhancers within the intact TAD. Combined, these features adapted an ancient regulatory landscape during evolution to support two entirely independent Rex1 and Fat1 expression programs. Thus, rather than operating only as rigid blocks of co-regulated genes, TAD-regulatory landscapes can orchestrate complex divergent expression patterns in evolution. HIGHLIGHTSO_LINew genes can emerge in evolution without taking on the expression pattern of their surrounding pre-existing TAD. C_LIO_LICompartmentalisation can restructure seemingly evolutionarily stable TADs to control a promoters access to enhancers. C_LIO_LILamina-associated domains neither prevent transcriptional activation nor enhancer-promoter communication. C_LIO_LIRepression rather than promoter-specificity refines when genes respond to promiscuous enhancer activities in specific tissues. C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 4
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Selective cross-TAD gene regulation by the Tcra enhancer during T cell development
Alonso Rodríguez-Caparrós, Laura López-Castellanos, … Cristina Hernández-Munaín·bioRxiv·May 1, 2026
- Functional dissection of TADs reveals non-essential and instructive roles in regulating gene expression
Alexandra Despang, Robert Schöpflin, … Daniel M. Ibrahim·bioRxiv·Mar 5, 2019
- Dynamic Runx1 chromatin boundaries affect gene expression in hematopoietic development
Dominic D. G. Owens, Giorgio Anselmi, … Marella F. T. R. De Bruijn·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Feb 9, 2022
- Evolutionary stability of topologically associating domains is associated with conserved gene regulation
Jan Krefting, Miguel Angel Andrade-Navarro, Jonas Ibn-Salem·BMC BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 7, 2018
- Synergistic insulation of regulatory domains by developmental genes and clusters of CTCF sites
Thais Ealo, Víctor Sánchez-Gaya, … Álvaro Rada-Iglesias·bioRxiv·Dec 15, 2023
- TAD border deletion at the Kit locus causes tissue-specific ectopic activation of a neighboring gene
Evelyn Kabirova, Anastasiya Ryzhkova, … Нариман Рашитович Баттулин·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·May 28, 2024