Sign in
GeneticsPLoS ONE
Peer-reviewed journal article

Confounds of using the unc-58 selection marker highlights the importance of genotyping co-CRISPR genes

Helena RawsthorneiD, Fernando CalahorroiD, Patricia G. IzquierdoiD, Philippe Tardy, Thomas BouliniD, Lindy M. Holden-DyeiD, Vincent M. O'ConnoriD, James DilloniD

Abstract

Multiple advances have been made to increase the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 editing using the model genetic organism Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans). Here we report on the use of co-CRISPR marker genes: worms in which co-CRISPR events have occurred have overt, visible phenotypes which facilitates the selection of worms that harbour CRISPR events in the target gene. Mutation in the co-CRISPR gene is then removed by outcrossing to wild type but this can be challenging if the CRISPR and co-CRISPR gene are hard to segregate. However, outcrossing can be avoided by selecting worms of wild type appearance from a jackpot brood. These are broods in which a high proportion of the progeny of a single injected worm display the co-CRISPR phenotype suggesting high CRISPR efficiency. This can deliver worms that harbour the desired mutation in the target gene locus without the co-CRISPR mutation. We have successfully generated a discrete mutation in the C. elegans nlg-1 gene using this method. However, in the process of sequencing to authenticate editing in the nlg-1 gene we discovered genomic rearrangements that arise at the co-CRISPR gene unc-58 that by visual observation were phenotypically silent but nonetheless resulted in a significant reduction in motility scored by thrashing behaviour. This highlights that careful consideration of the hidden consequences of co-CRISPR mediated genetic changes should be taken before downstream analysis of gene function. Given this, we suggest sequencing of co-CRISPR genes following CRISPR procedures that utilise phenotypic selection as part of the pipeline.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
7
FWCI
0.41
Field percentile
49th percentile

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISMouridi '17Zhang '14Li '20Ewen‐Campen '18Wang '18Au '18
67% semantic matchGenetics
Sonia El Mouridi, Claire Lecroisey, Philippe Tardy+4 more·G3 Genes Genomes Genetics·Mar 9, 2017· 101 citations