Confounds of using the unc-58 selection marker highlights the importance of genotyping co-CRISPR genes
Helena RawsthorneiD, Fernando CalahorroiD, Patricia G. IzquierdoiD, Philippe Tardy, Thomas BouliniD, Lindy M. Holden-DyeiD, Vincent M. O'ConnoriD, James DilloniD
Abstract
Multiple advances have been made to increase the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 editing using the model genetic organism Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans). Here we report on the use of co-CRISPR marker genes: worms in which co-CRISPR events have occurred have overt, visible phenotypes which facilitates the selection of worms that harbour CRISPR events in the target gene. Mutation in the co-CRISPR gene is then removed by outcrossing to wild type but this can be challenging if the CRISPR and co-CRISPR gene are hard to segregate. However, outcrossing can be avoided by selecting worms of wild type appearance from a jackpot brood. These are broods in which a high proportion of the progeny of a single injected worm display the co-CRISPR phenotype suggesting high CRISPR efficiency. This can deliver worms that harbour the desired mutation in the target gene locus without the co-CRISPR mutation. We have successfully generated a discrete mutation in the C. elegans nlg-1 gene using this method. However, in the process of sequencing to authenticate editing in the nlg-1 gene we discovered genomic rearrangements that arise at the co-CRISPR gene unc-58 that by visual observation were phenotypically silent but nonetheless resulted in a significant reduction in motility scored by thrashing behaviour. This highlights that careful consideration of the hidden consequences of co-CRISPR mediated genetic changes should be taken before downstream analysis of gene function. Given this, we suggest sequencing of co-CRISPR genes following CRISPR procedures that utilise phenotypic selection as part of the pipeline.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 0.41
- Field percentile
- 49th percentile
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Reliable CRISPR/Cas9 genome engineering in Caenorhabiditis elegans using a single efficient sgRNA and an easily selectable phenotype
Sonia El Mouridi, Claire Lecroisey, … Thomas Boulin·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 9, 2017
- Efficient site-specific editing of the C. elegans genome
Donglei Zhang, Michael Glotzer·bioRxiv·Jul 31, 2014
- Proxies of CRISPR-Cas9 activity to aid in the identification of mutagenized Arabidopsis plants
Renyu Li, Charles Vavrik, Cristian H. Danna·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 14, 2020
- ovoD co-selection: a method for enriching CRISPR/Cas9-edited alleles in Drosophila
Ben Ewen‐Campen, Norbert Perrimon·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 22, 2018
- An efficient genome editing strategy to generate putative null mutants in Caenorhabditis elegans using CRISPR/Cas9
Han Wang, Heenam Park, … Paul W. Sternberg·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2018
- Optimizing guide RNA selection and CRISPR/Cas9 methodology for efficient generation of deletions in C. elegans.
Vinci Au, Erica Li-Leger, … Donald G. Moerman·bioRxiv·Jul 1, 2018