Conservation and divergence of canonical and non-canonical imprinting in murids
Julien Richard AlbertiD, Toshihiro KobayashiiD, Azusa InoueiD, Ana MonteagudoiD, Soichiro KumamotoiD, Tomoya TakashimaiD, Asuka Miura, Mami OikawaiD, Fumihito MiuraiD, Shuji TakadaiD, Masumi HirabayashiiD, Keegan D. KorthaueriD, Kazuki KurimotoiD, Max GreenbergiD, Matthew C. LorincziD, Hisato KobayashiiD
Abstract
BackgroundGenomic imprinting affects gene expression in a parent-of-origin manner and has a profound impact on complex traits including growth and behaviour. While the rat is widely used to model human pathophysiology, few imprinted genes have been identified in this murid. To systematically identify imprinted genes and genomic imprints in the rat, we used low input methods for genome-wide analyses of gene expression and DNA methylation to profile embryonic and extra-embryonic tissues at allele-specific resolution. ResultsWe identify 14 and 26 imprinted genes in these tissues, respectively, with 10 of these genes imprinted in both tissues. Comparative analyses with mouse revealed that orthologous imprinted gene expression and associated canonical DNA methylation imprints are conserved in the embryo proper of the Muridae family. However, only 3 paternally expressed imprinted genes are conserved in the extra-embryonic tissue of murids, all of which are associated with non-canonical H3K27me3 imprints. The discovery of 8 novel non-canonical imprinted genes unique to the rat is consistent with more rapid evolution of extra-embryonic imprinting. Meta-analysis of novel imprinted genes revealed multiple mechanisms by which species-specific imprinted expression may be established, including H3K27me3 deposition in the oocyte, the birth of ZFP57 binding motifs and the insertion of endogenous retroviral promoters. ConclusionsIn summary, we provide a comprehensive list of imprinted loci in the rat, reveal the extent of conservation of imprinted gene expression, and identify potential mechanisms responsible for the evolution of species-specific imprinting.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 24
- FWCI
- 3.81
- Field percentile
- top 5%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evolution of parent-of-origin effects on placental gene expression in house mice
F. R. Caro, E. Moore, J. M. M. Good·bioRxiv·Aug 24, 2023
- A novel imprinting cluster at the porcine CRSP complex locus defines a species-specific imprinted domain
Jinsoo Ahn, In‐Sul Hwang, … Kichoon Lee·bioRxiv·Jan 9, 2026
- Evolution of imprinting via lineage-specific insertion of retroviral promoters
Aaron Bogutz, Julie Brind’Amour, … Louis Lefebvre·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Dec 12, 2019
- An extensive and unbiased genome-wide scan for parent-of-origin expressed genes in the pig clarifies the conservation landscape of genomic imprinting
Mathilde Perret, Nathalie Iannuccelli, … Julie Demars·Genetics Selection EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Mar 9, 2026
- H3K9 methyltransferase EHMT2/G9a controls ERVK-driven non-canonical imprinted genes
Tie-Bo Zeng, Nicholas Pierce, … Piroska E. Szabó·EpigenomicsPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2021
- Characterization Of Imprinted Genes In Rice Reveals Post-Fertilization Regulation And Conservation At Some Loci Of Imprinting In Plant Species