Extraocular muscle stem cells exhibit distinct cellular properties associated with non-muscle molecular signatures
Daniela Di GirolamoiD, Maria Benavente-DiaziD, Melania MuroloiD, Alexandre GrimaldiiD, Priscilla Thomas LopesiD, Brendan EvanoiD, Mao KurikiiD, Stamatia Gioftsidi, Vincent LavilleiD, Jean-Yves TinéveziD, Gaëlle LetortiD, Sébastian Mella, Shahragim TajbakhshiD, Glenda ComaiiD
Abstract
The muscle stem cell (MuSC) population is recognized as functionally heterogeneous. Cranial muscle stem cells, which originate from head mesoderm, can have greater proliferative capacity in culture and higher regenerative potential in transplantation assays when compared to those in the limb. The existence of such functional differences in phenotypic outputs remain unresolved as a comprehensive understanding of the underlying mechanisms is lacking. We addressed this issue using a combination of clonal analysis, live imaging, and scRNA-seq, identifying critical biological features that distinguish extraocular (EOM) and limb (Tibialis anterior, TA) MuSC populations. Time-lapse studies using a MyogenintdTomatoreporter showed that the increased proliferation capacity of EOM MuSCs is accompanied by a differentiation delay in vitro. Unexpectedly, in vitro activated EOM MuSCs expressed a large array of distinct extracellular matrix (ECM) components, growth factors, and signaling molecules that are typically associated with mesenchymal non-muscle cells. These unique features are regulated by a specific set of transcription factors that constitute a coregulating module. This transcription factor network, which includes Foxc1 as one of the major players, appears to be hardwired to EOM identity as it is present in quiescent adult MuSCs, in the activated counterparts during growth and retained upon passages in vitro. These findings provide insights into how high-performing MuSCs regulate myogenic commitment by active remodeling of their local environment.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 8
- FWCI
- 1.09
- Field percentile
- top 27%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Transcriptome and epigenome diversity and plasticity of muscle stem cells following transplantation
Brendan Evano, Diljeet Gill, … Shahragim Tajbakhsh·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 30, 2020
- Interplay between Pitx2 and Pax7 temporally governs specification of extraocular muscle progenitors
M. Kuriki, G. Comai, S. Tajbakhsh·bioRxiv·Aug 24, 2023
- Skeletal Muscle Stem Cell-Derived Myonuclei Adopt Divergent Terminal Transcriptional States in Adult and Aged Muscle In Response to a Hypertrophic Stimulus
Nicholas T. Thomas, Jensen Z. Goh, … Yuan Wen·bioRxiv·Aug 27, 2026
- Defining a Muscle Stem Cell matrisome signature: from transcriptome data to extracellular matrix niche topology.
Emilie Guillon, Hisoilat Bacar, … Florence Ruggiero·Stem Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Sep 11, 2025
- Myofiber stretch induces tensile and shear deformation of muscle stem cells in their native niche
M. Haroon, J. Klein-Nulend, … R. T. Jaspers·Biophysical JournalPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2021
- Induction of muscle stem cell quiescence by the secreted niche factor Oncostatin M
S. C. Sampath, S. C. Sampath, … H. M. Blau·bioRxiv·Apr 18, 2018