Sign in

Abstract

Complex antibody formats are advancing in the biotherapeutic landscape to address the need for multi-specificity, tailored valency, and novel mechanisms of action. However, understanding how non-canonical architectures impact fundamental pharmacokinetic pathways remains a critical challenge. While canonical IgGs experience steric hindrance at the endosomal membrane during FcRn engagement, whether -- and how strongly -- this constraint impacts FcRn-mediated recycling across the expanding diversity of non-canonical antibody architectures has remained unknown. By systematically evaluating a diverse panel of rationally designed antibody geometries utilizing orthogonal in vitro assays we demonstrate that spatial layout profoundly influences FcRn-recycling efficiency; inverting the antibody structure by positioning the Fab-domains to the C-terminus (invertbodies) maximizes recycling, whereas crowding the N-terminus severely impairs it. In contrast, non-specific endocytosis was only modestly and inconsistently affected by Fab number, dependent on the Fv-sequence, but not by the spatial architecture itself. Notably, antibody architecture and affinity-enhancing Fc-FcRn mutations act independently yet cooperatively, ultimately revealing a physiological recycling ceiling. These FcRn-recycling dynamics translate with high fidelity to in vivo clearance (CL) in a humanized FcRn mouse model. Across the antibody panel, architecture drove a near 15-fold variance in CL, an effect that collapsed in FcRn-knockout mice. As proof of concept, we applied the invertbody design to a variant of the marketed antibody golimumab, achieving a three-fold reduction in clearance without compromising potency. These findings reveal the magnitude and predictability with which the antibody architecture governs FcRn-recycling and non-specific CL, establishing a rational, generalizable framework to optimize the pharmacokinetics of biotherapeutics.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.