Lack of antiviral activity of probenecid in Vero E6 cells and Syrian golden hamsters: a need for better understanding of inter-lab differences in preclinical assays.
H. J. Box, S. H. Pennington, E. Kijack, L. Tatham, C. H. Caygill, R. C. Lopeman, L. N. Jeffreys, J. Herriott, J. Sharp, M. Neary, A. Valentijn, H. Pertinez, P. Curley, U. Arshad, R. K. Rajoli, S. Rannard, J. P. Stewart, G. Biagini, A. Owen
Abstract
Antiviral interventions are urgently required to support vaccination programmes and reduce the global burden of COVID-19. Prior to initiation of large-scale clinical trials, robust preclinical data in support of candidate plausibility are required. The speed at which preclinical models have been developed during the pandemic are unprecedented but there is a vital need for standardisation and assessment of the Critical Quality Attributes. This work provides cross-validation for the recent report demonstrating potent antiviral activity of probenecid against SARS-CoV-2 in preclinical models (1). Vero E6 cells were pre-incubated with probenecid, across a 7-point concentration range, or control media for 2 hours before infection with SARS-CoV-2 (SARS-CoV-2/Human/Liverpool/REMRQ0001/2020, Pango B; MOI 0.05). Probenecid or control media was then reapplied and plates incubated for 48 hours. Cells were fixed with 4% v/v paraformaldehyde, stained with crystal violet and cytopathic activity quantified by spectrophotometry at 590 nm. Syrian golden hamsters (n=5 per group) were intranasally inoculated with virus (SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant B.1.617.2; 103 PFU/hamster) for 24 hours prior to treatment. Hamsters were treated with probenecid or vehicle for 4 doses. Hamsters were ethically euthanised before quantification of total and sub-genomic pulmonary viral RNAs. No inhibition of cytopathic activity was observed for probenecid at any concentration in Vero E6 cells. Furthermore, no reduction in either total or sub-genomic RNA was observed in terminal lung samples from hamsters on day 3 (P > 0.05). Body weight of uninfected hamsters remained stable throughout the course of the experiment whereas both probenecid- (6 - 9% over 3 days) and vehicle-treated (5 - 10% over 3 days) infected hamsters lost body weight which was comparable in magnitude (P > 0.5). The presented data do not support probenecid as a SARS-CoV-2 antiviral. These data do not support use of probenecid in COVID-19 and further analysis is required prior to initiation of clinical trials to investigate the potential utility of this drug.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Probenecid Inhibits SARS-CoV-2 Replication In Vivo and In Vitro
J. Murray, R. J. Hogan, … R. A. Tripp·bioRxiv·May 21, 2021
- Antiviral treatment of SARS-CoV-2-infected hamsters reveals a weak effect of favipiravir and a complete lack of effect for hydroxychloroquine
S. J. Kaptein, S. Jacobs, … L. Delang·bioRxiv·Jun 19, 2020
- Defining the Syrian hamster as a highly susceptible preclinical model for SARS-CoV-2 infection
K. Rosenke, K. Meade-White, … H. Feldmann·bioRxiv·Sep 25, 2020
- Ambroxol and Ciprofloxacin Show Activity Against SARS-CoV2 in Vero E6 Cells at Clinically-Relevant Concentrations
G. S. Timmins, S. B. Bradfute, … C. Ye·bioRxiv·Aug 11, 2020
- Ivermectin does not protect against SARS-CoV-2 infection in the Syrian hamster model
C. S.-Y. Foo, R. Abdelnabi, … J. Neyts·bioRxiv·Feb 22, 2022
- Hydroxychloroquine Proves Ineffective in Hamsters and Macaques Infected with SARS-CoV-2
K. Rosenke, M. Jarvis, … H. Feldmann·bioRxiv·Jun 10, 2020