A ChIP-exo screen of 887 PCRP transcription factor antibodies in human cells
W. K. Lai, L. Mariani, G. Rothschild, E. R. Smith, B. J. Venters, T. R. Blanda, P. K. Kuntala, K. Bocklund, J. Mairose, S. N. Dweikat, K. Mistretta, M. J. Rossi, D. James, J. T. Anderson, S. K. Phanor, W. Zhang, Z. Zhao, A. P. Shaw, K. Novitzky, E. McAnarney, M.-C. Keogh, A. Shilatifard, U. Basu, M. Bulyk, B. F. Pugh
Abstract
Antibodies offer a powerful means to interrogate specific proteins in a complex milieu. However, antibody availability and reliability are problematic and epitope tagging can be impractical in many cases. In an effort to improve this situation, the Protein Capture Reagents Program (PCRP) generated over a thousand renewable monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against human-presumptive chromatin proteins. However, these reagents have not been widely field-tested. We therefore performed a screen to test their ability to enrich genomic regions via chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and a variety of orthogonal assays. 887 unique antibodies against 681 unique human transcription factors (TFs), were assayed by ultra-high resolution ChIP-exo/seq, primarily in a single pass in one cell type (K562). Deep systematic analyses of the resulting [~]1,200 ChIP-exo datasets can be found at www.PCRPvalidation.org. Subsets of PCRP mAbs were further tested in ChIP-seq, CUT&RUN, STORM super-resolution microscopy, immunoblots, and protein binding microarray (PBM) experiments. About 5% of the tested antibodies displayed target (i.e., cognate antigen) enrichment across at least one assay and are strong candidates for additional validation. An additional 34% produced ChIP-exo data that was distinct from background and thus warrant further testing. The remaining 61% were not substantially different from background, and likely require consideration of a much broader survey of cell types and/or assay optimizations. We demonstrate and discuss the metrics and challenges to antibody validation in chromatin-based assays.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A toolbox of immunoprecipitation-grade monoclonal antibodies against human transcription factors.
Anand Venkataraman, Kun Yang, … Seth Blackshaw·bioRxiv·Mar 16, 2017
- Systematic comparison of monoclonal versus polyclonal antibodies for mapping histone modifications by ChIP-seq
Michele Busby, Catherine Xue, … Alon Goren·Epigenetics & ChromatinPeer-reviewed·Nov 4, 2016
- Optimized ChIP-exo for mammalian cells and patterned sequencing flow cells
Daniela Q. James, Sohini Mukherjee, … Shaun Mahony·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 7, 2025
- Examining NFκB Genomic Interactions by ChIP-seq and CUT&Tag
Allison E. Daly, Allison Schiffman, … Stephen T. Smale·bioRxiv·Aug 11, 2024
- Cell type-specific monoclonal antibody cross-reactivity screening in non-human primates and development of comparative immunophenotyping panels for CyTOF
Z. B. Bjornson-Hooper, G. K. Fragiadakis, … G. P. Nolan·bioRxiv·Mar 14, 2019
- An extensively optimized chromatin immunoprecipitation protocol for quantitatively comparable and robust results
Wim J. de Jonge, Mariel O. Brok, … Frank C. P. Holstege·STAR ProtocolsPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2020