Error-prone bypass of DNA lesions during lagging strand replication is a common source of germline and cancer mutations
V. Seplyarskiy, E. E. Akkuratov, N. V. Akkuratova, M. A. Andrianova, S. I. Nikolaev, G. A. Bazykin, I. Adameyko, S. R. Sunyaev
Abstract
Spontaneously occurring mutations are of great relevance in diverse fields including biochemistry, oncology, evolutionary biology, and human genetics. Studies in experimental systems have identified a multitude of mutational mechanisms including DNA replication infidelity as well as many forms of DNA damage followed by inefficient repair or replicative bypass. However, the relative contributions of these mechanisms to human germline mutations remain completely unknown. Here, based on the mutational asymmetry with respect to the direction of replication and transcription, we suggest that error-prone damage bypass on the lagging strand plays a major role in human mutagenesis. Asymmetry with respect to transcription is believed to be mediated by the action of transcription-coupled DNA repair (TC-NER). TC-NER selectively repairs DNA lesions on the transcribed strand; as a result, lesions on the non-transcribed strand are preferentially converted into mutations. In human polymorphism we detect a striking similarity between transcriptional asymmetry and asymmetry with respect to replication fork direction. This parallels the observation that damage-induced mutations in human cancers accumulate asymmetrically with respect to the direction of replication, suggesting that DNA lesions are asymmetrically resolved during replication. Re-analysis of XR-seq data, Damage-seq data and cancers with defective NER corroborate the preferential error-prone bypass of DNA lesions on the lagging strand. We experimentally demonstrate that replication delay greatly attenuates the mutagenic effect of UV-irradiation, in line with the key role of replication in conversion of DNA damage to mutations. We conservatively estimate that at least 10% of human germline mutations arise due to DNA damage rather than replication infidelity. The number of these damage-induced mutations is expected to scale with the number of replications and, consequently, paternal age.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Strand-resolved mutagenicity of DNA damage and repair
Craig J. Anderson, Lana Talmane, … Martin S. Taylor·NaturePeer-reviewed·Jun 12, 2024
- Post-replicative lesion processing limits DNA damage-induced mutagenesis
Katarzyna H. Masłowska, Ronald P.C. Wong, … Vincent Pagès·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Mar 3, 2025
- Human mismatch repair system corrects errors produced during lagging strand replication more effectively
Maria Andrianova, Georgii A Bazykin, … Vladimir Seplyarskiy·bioRxiv·Mar 23, 2016
- Overlooked roles of DNA damage and maternal age in generating human germline mutations
Ziyue Gao, Priya Moorjani, … Molly Przeworski·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Apr 24, 2019
- Replication origins drive genetic and phenotypic variation in humans
Pierre Murat, Guillaume Guilbaud, Julian E. Sale·bioRxiv·Dec 16, 2021
- Widespread impact of DNA replication on mutational mechanisms in cancer
M. Tomkova, J. Tomek, … B. Schuster-Boeckler·bioRxiv·Aug 19, 2017