Murine gut microbiota dysbiosis via enteric infection modulates the foreign body response to a distal biomaterial implant
Brenda YangiD, Natalie RutkowskiiD, Anna RutaiD, Elise F. Gray-GaillardiD, David R. MaestasiD, Sean H. KellyiD, Kavita KrishnaniD, Xinqun WuiD, Shaoguang WuiD, Allen R. CheniD, Connor D. AmelungiD, Joscelyn C. MejíasiD, Joshua S. T. HooksiD, Isabel VanderzeeiD, Patricia Mensah, Nazmiye CelikiD, Marie Eric, Peter Abraham, Ada Tam, Sharon GerechtiD, Franck HousseauiD, Drew M. Pardoll, Cynthia L. SearsiD, Jennifer H. ElisseeffiD
Abstract
The gut microbiota influences systemic immunity and the function of distal tissues, including the brain, liver, skin, lung, and muscle. However, the role of the gut microbiota in the foreign body response (FBR) and fibrosis around medical implants is largely unexplored. To investigate this connection, we perturbed the homeostasis of the murine gut microbiota via enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis (ETBF) infection and implanted the synthetic polymer polycaprolactone (PCL) into a distal muscle injury. ETBF infection in mice led to increased neutrophil and {gamma}{delta} T cell infiltration into the PCL implant site. ETBF infection alone promoted systemic inflammation and increased levels of neutrophils in the blood, spleen, and bone marrow. At the PCL implant site, we found significant changes in the transcriptome of sorted fibroblasts but did not observe gross ETBF- induced differences in the fibrosis levels after 6 weeks. These results demonstrate the ability of the gut microbiota to mediate long-distance effects such as immune and stromal responses to a distal biomaterial implant. Significance StatementThe foreign body response to implants leads to chronic inflammation and fibrosis that can be highly variable in the general patient population. Here, we demonstrate that gut dysbiosis via enteric infection promoted systemic inflammation and increased immune cell recruitment to an anatomically distant implant site. These results implicate the gut microbiota as a potential source of variability in the clinical biomaterial response and illustrate that the local tissue environment can be influenced by host factors that modulate systemic interactions.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 5
- FWCI
- 1.51
- Field percentile
- top 19%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Immune-informed mucin hydrogels evade fibrotic foreign body response in vivo
H. Yan, C. Seignez, … T. Crouzier·bioRxiv·Feb 19, 2019
- Biomaterial based implants caused remote liver fatty deposition through activated blood-derived Kupffer cells
Z. Peng, C. Xie, … O. Hongwei·bioRxiv·Apr 12, 2023
- Foreign Body Responses Adapt to Systemic Immunosuppression to Maintain Local Immune Homeostasis Through Decorin-Associated Signaling
Yuwei Zhang, Jing Wang·bioRxiv·Nov 2, 2026
- Persistent glycolysis defines the foreign body response to polymeric implants.
Christian N. Rempe, Neal I. Callaghan, … Locke Davenport Huyer·bioRxiv·Feb 4, 2025
- FIBRIN POLYMER ON THE SURFACE OF BIOMATERIAL IMPLANTS DRIVES THE FOREIGN BODY REACTION
A. Balabiyev, N. P. Podolnikova, … T. P. Ugarova·bioRxiv·Feb 16, 2021
- Macrophage microRNA-146a is a central regulator of the foreign body response to biomaterial implants
Manisha Mahanty, Bidisha Dutta, … Shaik O. Rahaman·BiomaterialsPeer-reviewed·Apr 4, 2024